mdwmath.dtx: Use `\@testopt', which I've just noticed.
[mdwtools] / mdwmath.dtx
1 % \begin{meta-comment} <general public licence>
2 %%
3 %% mdwmath package -- various nicer mathematical things
4 %% Copyright (c) 2003, 2020 Mark Wooding
5 %%
6 %% This file is part of the `mdwtools' LaTeX package collection.
7 %%
8 %% `mdwtools' is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it
9 %% under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
10 %% Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your
11 %% option) any later version.
12 %%
13 %% `mdwtools' is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
14 %% WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
15 %% MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
16 %% General Public License for more details.
17 %%
18 %% You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
19 %% along with `mdwtools'. If not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
20 %% Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
21 %%
22 % \end{meta-comment}
23 %
24 % \begin{meta-comment} <Package preamble>
25 %<+package>\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}
26 %<+package>\ProvidesPackage{mdwmath}
27 %<+package> [2020/09/06 1.14.0 Nice mathematical things]
28 % \end{meta-comment}
29 %
30 % \CheckSum{727}
31 %% \CharacterTable
32 %% {Upper-case \A\B\C\D\E\F\G\H\I\J\K\L\M\N\O\P\Q\R\S\T\U\V\W\X\Y\Z
33 %% Lower-case \a\b\c\d\e\f\g\h\i\j\k\l\m\n\o\p\q\r\s\t\u\v\w\x\y\z
34 %% Digits \0\1\2\3\4\5\6\7\8\9
35 %% Exclamation \! Double quote \" Hash (number) \#
36 %% Dollar \$ Percent \% Ampersand \&
37 %% Acute accent \' Left paren \( Right paren \)
38 %% Asterisk \* Plus \+ Comma \,
39 %% Minus \- Point \. Solidus \/
40 %% Colon \: Semicolon \; Less than \<
41 %% Equals \= Greater than \> Question mark \?
42 %% Commercial at \@ Left bracket \[ Backslash \\
43 %% Right bracket \] Circumflex \^ Underscore \_
44 %% Grave accent \` Left brace \{ Vertical bar \|
45 %% Right brace \} Tilde \~}
46 %%
47 %
48 % \begin{meta-comment}
49 %
50 %<*driver>
51 \input{mdwtools}
52 \let\opmod\pmod
53 \usepackage{amssymb}
54 \describespackage{mdwmath}
55 \mdwdoc
56 %</driver>
57 %
58 % \end{meta-comment}
59 %
60 % \section{User guide}
61 %
62 % \subsection{Square root typesetting}
63 %
64 % \DescribeMacro{\sqrt}
65 % The package supplies a star variant of the |\sqrt| command which omits the
66 % vinculum over the operand (the line over the top). While this is most
67 % useful in simple cases like $\sqrt*{2}$ it works for any size of operand.
68 % The package also re-implements the standard square root command so that it
69 % positions the root number rather better.
70 %
71 % \begin{figure}
72 % \begin{demo}[w]{Examples of the new square root command}
73 %\[ \sqrt*{2} \quad \mbox{rather than} \quad \sqrt{2} \]
74 %\[ \sqrt*[3]{2} \quad \mbox{ rather than } \quad \sqrt[3]{2} \]
75 %\[ \sqrt{x^3 + \sqrt*[y]{\alpha}} - \sqrt*[n+1]{a} \]
76 %\[ x = \sqrt*[3]{\frac{3y}{7}} \]
77 %\[ q = \frac{2\sqrt*{2}}{5}+\sqrt[\frac{n+1}{2}]{2x^2+3xy-y^2} \]
78 % \end{demo}
79 % \end{figure}
80 %
81 % [Note that omission of the vinculum was originally a cost-cutting exercise
82 % because the radical symbol can just fit in next to its operand and
83 % everything ends up being laid out along a line. However, I find that the
84 % square root without vinculum is less cluttered, so I tend to use it when
85 % it doesn't cause ambiguity.]
86 %
87 % \subsection{Modular arithmetic}
88 %
89 % In standard maths mode, there's too much space before the parentheses in
90 % the output of the |\pmod| command. Suppose that $x \equiv y^2 \opmod n$:
91 % then the spacing looks awful. Go on, admit it.
92 %
93 % It looks OK in a display. For example, if
94 % \[ c \equiv m^e \opmod n \]
95 % then it's fine. The package redefines the |\pmod| command to do something
96 % more sensible. So now $c^d \equiv m^{ed} \equiv m \pmod n$ and all looks
97 % fine.
98 %
99 % \subsection{Some maths symbols you already have}
100 %
101 % \DescribeMacro\bitor
102 % \DescribeMacro\bitand
103 % \DescribeMacro\dblor
104 % \DescribeMacro\dbland
105 % Having just tried to do some simple things, I've found that there are maths
106 % symbols missing. Here they are, in all their glory:
107 % \begin{center} \unverb\| \begin{tabular}{cl|cl|cl}
108 % $\&$ & "\&" & $\bitor$ & "\bitor" & $\dbland$ & "\dbland" \\
109 % $\bitand$ & "\bitand" & $\dblor$ & "\dblor" &
110 % \end{tabular} \end{center}
111 %
112 % \DescribeMacro\xor
113 % \DescribeMacro\cat
114 % I also set up the |\xor| command to typeset `$\xor$', which is commonly
115 % used to represent the bitsize exclusive-or operation among cryptographers.
116 % The command |\cat| typesets `$\cat$', which is a common operator indicating
117 % concatenation of strings.
118 %
119 % \DescribeMacro\lsl
120 % \DescribeMacro\lsr
121 % \DescribeMacro\rol
122 % \DescribeMacro\ror
123 % The commands |\lsl| and |\lsr| typeset binary operators `$\lsl$' and
124 % `$\lsr$' respectively, and |\rol| and |\ror| typeset `$\rol$' and `$\ror$'.
125 % Note that these are spaced as binary operators, rather than relations.
126 %
127 % \DescribeMacro\compose
128 % \DescribeMacro\implies
129 % \DescribeMacro\vect
130 % The |\compose| command typesets `$\compose$', which is usually used to
131 % denote function composition. The |\implies| command is made to typeset
132 % `$\implies$'. And \syntax{"\\vect{"<x>"}"} typesets `$\vect{x}$'.
133 %
134 % \DescribeMacro\statclose
135 % \DescribeMacro\compind
136 % The |\statclose| command typesets `$\statclose$', which indicates
137 % `statistical closeness' of probability distributions; |\compind| typesets
138 % `$\compind$', which indicates computational indistinguishability.
139 %
140 % \subsection{Fractions}
141 %
142 % \DescribeMacro\fracdef
143 % We provide a general fraction system, a little tiny bit like
144 % \package{amsmath}'s |\genfrac|. Say
145 % \syntax{"\\fracdef{"<name>"}{"<frac-params>"}"} to define a new
146 % |\frac|-like operator. The \<frac-params> are a comma-separated list of
147 % parameters:
148 % \begin{description}
149 % \item[\lit*{line}] Include a horizontal line between the top and bottom
150 % (like |\frac|).
151 % \item[\lit*{line=}\<length>] Include a horizontal line with width
152 % \<length>.
153 % \item[\lit*{noline}] Don't include a line (like |\binom|).
154 % \item[\lit*{leftdelim=}\<delim>] Use \<delim> as the left-hand delimiter.
155 % \item[\lit*{rightdelim=}\<delim>] Use \<delim> as the right-hand delimiter.
156 % \item[\lit*{nodelims}] Don't include delimiters.
157 % \item[\lit*{style=}\<style>] Typeset the fraction in \<style>, which is one
158 % of |display|, |text|, |script| or |scriptscript|.
159 % \item[\lit*{style}] Use the prevailing style for the fraction.
160 % \item[\lit*{innerstyle=}\<style>] Typeset the \emph{components} of the
161 % fraction in \<style>.
162 % \item[\lit*{innerstyle}] Typeset the fraction components according to the
163 % prevailing style.
164 % \end{description}
165 % The commands created by |\fracdef| have the following syntax:
166 % \syntax{<name>"["<frac-params>"]{"<top>"}{"<bottom>"}"}. Thus, you can use
167 % the optional argument to `tweak' the fraction if necessary. This isn't
168 % such a good idea to do often.
169 %
170 % \DescribeMacro\frac
171 % \DescribeMacro\binom
172 % \DescribeMacro\jacobi
173 % The macros |\frac|, |\binom| and |\jacobi| are defined using |\fracdef|.
174 % They typset $\frac{x}{y}$, $\binom{n}{k}$ and $\jacobi{x}{n}$ respectively.
175 % (The last may be of use to number theorists talking about Jacobi or
176 % Lagrange symbols.)
177 %
178 % By way of example, these commands were defined using
179 %\begin{verbatim}
180 %\fracdef\frac{nodelims, line}
181 %\fracdef\binom{leftdelim = (, rightdelim = ), noline}
182 %\fracdef\jacobi{leftdelim = (, rightdelim = ), line}
183 %\end{verbatim}
184 %
185 % \subsection{Rant about derivatives}
186 %
187 % \DescribeMacro\d
188 % There is a difference between UK and US typesetting of derivatives.
189 % Americans typeset
190 % \[ \frac{dy}{dx} \]
191 % while the British want
192 % \[ \frac{\d y}{\d x}. \]
193 % The command |\d| command is fixed to typeset a `$\d$'. (In text mode,
194 % |\d{x}| still typesets `\d{x}'.)
195 %
196 % \subsection{New operator names}
197 %
198 % \DescribeMacro\keys
199 % \DescribeMacro\dom
200 % \DescribeMacro\ran
201 % \DescribeMacro\supp
202 % \DescribeMacro\lcm
203 % \DescribeMacro\ord
204 % \DescribeMacro\poly
205 % \DescribeMacro\negl
206 % A few esoteric new operator names are supplied.
207 % \begin{center} \unverb\| \begin{tabular}{cl|cl|cl}
208 % $\keys$ & "\keys" & $\dom$ & "\dom" & $\ran$ & "\ran" \\
209 % $\supp$ & "\supp" & $\lcm$ & "\lcm" & $\ord$ & "\ord" \\
210 % $\poly$ & "\poly" & $\negl$ & "\negl"
211 % \end{tabular} \end{center}
212 % I think |\lcm| ought to be self-explanatory. The |\dom| and |\ran|
213 % operators pick out the domain and range of a function, respectively; thus,
214 % if $F\colon X \to Y$ is a function, then $\dom F = X$ and $\ran F = Y$.
215 % The \emph{support} of a probability distribution $\mathcal{D}$ is the set
216 % of objects with nonzero probability; i.e., $\supp{D} = \{\, x \in
217 % \dom\mathcal{D} \mid \mathcal{D}(x) > 0 \,\}$. If $g \in G$ is a group
218 % element then $\ord g$ is the \emph{order} of $g$; i.e., the smallest
219 % positive integer $i$ where $g^i$ is the identity element, or $0$ if there
220 % is no such $i$. $\poly(n)$ is some polynomial function of $n$. A function
221 % $\nu(\cdot)$ is \emph{negligible} if, for every polynomial function
222 % $p(\cdot)$, there is an integer $N$ such that $\nu(n) < 1/p(n)$ for all $n
223 % > N$; $\negl(n)$ is some negligible function of $n$.
224 %
225 % \DescribeMacro\defop
226 % New operators can be defined using |\defop|:
227 % \begin{quote} \syntax{"\\defop"["*"]"{"<command>"}{"<text>"}"} \end{quote}
228 % defines \<command> to be an operator which typesets \<text>. By default,
229 % limits will be placed above and below the operator in display style; with
230 % |*|, limits are always written as super- and subscripts.
231 %
232 % \subsection{Standard set names}
233 %
234 % \DescribeMacro\Z
235 % \DescribeMacro\Q
236 % \DescribeMacro\R
237 % \DescribeMacro\C
238 % \DescribeMacro\N
239 % \DescribeMacro\F
240 % \DescribeMacro\powerset
241 % \DescribeMacro\gf
242 % If you have a |\mathbb| command defined, the following magic is revealed:
243 % \begin{center} \unverb\| \begin{tabular}{cl|cl|cl}
244 % $\Z$ & "\Z" & $\Q$ & "\Q" & $\R$ & "\R" \\
245 % $\N$ & "\N" & $\F$ & "\F" & $\C$ & "\C"
246 % \end{tabular} \end{center}
247 % which are handy for various standard sets of things. Also the |\powerset|
248 % command typesets `$\powerset$', and \syntax{"\\gf{"<q>"}"}, which by default
249 % typesets $\gf{\syntax{<q>}}$ but you might choose to have it set
250 % $\mathrm{GF}(\syntax{<q>})$ intead.
251 %
252 % \subsection{Biggles}
253 %
254 % \DescribeMacro\bbigg
255 % \DescribeMacro\bbiggl
256 % \DescribeMacro\bbiggr
257 % \DescribeMacro\bbiggm
258 % The |\bbigg| commands generalizes the Plain \TeX\ |\bigg| family of
259 % macros. |\bbigg| produces an `ordinary' symbol; |\bbiggl| and |\bbiggr|
260 % produce left and right delimiters; and |\bbiggm| produces a relation. They
261 % produce symbols whose size is related to the prevailing text size -- so
262 % they adjust correctly in chapter headings, for example.
263 %
264 % The syntax is straightforward:
265 % \syntax{"\\"<bigop>"["$a$"]{"$n$"}{"<delim>"}"}. Describing it is a bit
266 % trickier. The size is based on the current |\strut| height. If |\strut|
267 % has a height of $h$ and a depth of $d$, then the delimiter produced has a
268 % height of $n \times (h + d + a)$.
269 %
270 % The old |\big| commands have been redefined in terms of |\bbigg|.
271 %
272 % \subsection{The `QED' symbol}
273 %
274 % \DescribeMacro\qed
275 % \DescribeMacro\qedrule
276 % For use in proofs of theorems, we provide a `QED' symbol which behaves well
277 % under bizarre line-splitting conditions. To use it, just say |\qed|. The
278 % little `\qedrule' symbol is available on its own, by saying |\qedrule|.
279 % This also sets |\qedsymbol| if it's not set already.
280 % \qed
281 %
282 % \subsection{Punctuation in displays}
283 %
284 % It's conventional to follow displayed equations with the necessary
285 % punctuation for them to fit into the surrounding prose. This isn't
286 % universal: Ian Stewart says in the preface to the third edition of his
287 % \emph{Galois Theory}:\footnote{^^A
288 % Chapman \& Hall/CRC Mathematics, 2004; ISBN 1-58488-393-6.} ^^A
289 % \begin{quote}
290 % Along the way I made once change that may raise a few eyebrows. I have
291 % spent much of my career telling students that written mathematics should
292 % have punctuation as well as symbols. If a symbol or a formula would be
293 % followed by a comma if it were replaced by a word or phrase, then it
294 % should be followed by a comma; however strange the formula then looks.
295 %
296 % I still think that punctuation is essential for formulas in the main body
297 % of the text. If the formula is $t^2 + 1$, say, then it should have its
298 % terminating comma. But I have come to the conclusion that eliminating
299 % visual junk from the printed page is more important than punctuatory
300 % pedantry, so that when the same formula is \emph{displayed}, for example
301 % \[ t^2 + 1 \]
302 % then it looks silly if the comma is included, like this,
303 % \[ t^2 + 1 \mpunct{,} \]
304 % and everything is much cleaner and less ambiguous without punctuation.
305 %
306 % Purists will hate this, though many of them would not have noticed had I
307 % not pointed it out here. Until recently, I would have agreed. But I
308 % think it is time we accepted that the act of displaying a formula equips
309 % it with \emph{implicit} (invisible) punctuation. This is the 21st
310 % century, and typography has moved on.
311 % \end{quote}%
312 %
313 % \DescribeMacro\mpunct
314 % I tended to agree with Prof.\ Stewart, even before I read his preface; but
315 % now I'm not so sure, and it's clear that we're in the minority. Therefore,
316 % the command |\mpunct| sets its argument as text, a little distance from
317 % the preceding mathematics.
318 %
319 % \implementation
320 %
321 % \section{Implementation}
322 %
323 % This isn't really complicated (honest) although it is a lot hairier than I
324 % think it ought to be.
325 %
326 % \begin{macrocode}
327 %<*package>
328 \RequirePackage{amssymb}
329 \RequirePackage{mdwkey}
330 % \end{macrocode}
331 %
332 % \subsection{Square roots}
333 %
334 % \subsubsection{Where is the square root sign?}
335 %
336 % \LaTeX\ hides the square root sign away somewhere without telling anyone
337 % where it is. I extract it forcibly by peeking inside the |\sqrtsign| macro
338 % and scrutinising the contents. Here we go: prepare for yukkiness.
339 %
340 % \begin{macrocode}
341 \newcount\sq@sqrt \begingroup \catcode`\|0 \catcode`\\12
342 |def|sq@readrad#1"#2\#3|relax{|global|sq@sqrt"#2|relax}
343 |expandafter|sq@readrad|meaning|sqrtsign|relax |endgroup
344 \def\sq@delim{\delimiter\sq@sqrt\relax}
345 % \end{macrocode}
346 %
347 % \subsubsection{Drawing fake square root signs}
348 %
349 % \TeX\ absolutely insists on drawing square root signs with a vinculum over
350 % the top. In order to get the same effect, we have to attempt to emulate
351 % \TeX's behaviour.
352 %
353 % \begin{macro}{\sqrtdel}
354 %
355 % This does the main job of typesetting a vinculum-free radical.\footnote{^^A
356 % Note for chemists: this is nothing to do with short-lived things which
357 % don't have their normal numbers of electrons. And it won't reduce the
358 % appearance of wrinkles either.}
359 % It's more or less a duplicate of what \TeX\ does internally, so it might be
360 % a good plan to have a copy of Appendix~G open while you examine this.
361 %
362 % We start off by using |\mathpalette| to help decide how big things should
363 % be.
364 %
365 % \begin{macrocode}
366 \def\sqrtdel{\mathpalette\sqrtdel@i}
367 % \end{macrocode}
368 %
369 % Read the contents of the radical into a box, so we can measure it.
370 %
371 % \begin{macrocode}
372 \def\sqrtdel@i#1#2{%
373 \setbox\z@\hbox{$\m@th#1#2$}% %%% Bzzzt -- uncramps the mathstyle
374 % \end{macrocode}
375 %
376 % Now try and sort out the values needed in this calculation. We'll assume
377 % that $\xi_8$ is 0.6\,pt, the way it usually is. Next try to work out the
378 % value of $\varphi$.
379 %
380 % \begin{macrocode}
381 \ifx#1\displaystyle%
382 \@tempdima1ex%
383 \else%
384 \@tempdima.6\p@%
385 \fi%
386 % \end{macrocode}
387 %
388 % That was easy. Now for $\psi$.
389 %
390 % \begin{macrocode}
391 \@tempdimb.6\p@%
392 \advance\@tempdimb.25\@tempdima%
393 % \end{macrocode}
394 %
395 % Build the `delimiter' in a box of height $h(x)+d(x)+\psi+\xi_8$, as
396 % requested. Box~2 will do well for this purpose.
397 %
398 % \begin{macrocode}
399 \dimen@.6\p@%
400 \advance\dimen@\@tempdimb%
401 \advance\dimen@\ht\z@%
402 \advance\dimen@\dp\z@%
403 \setbox\tw@\hbox{%
404 $\left\sq@delim\vcenter to\dimen@{}\right.\n@space$%
405 }%
406 % \end{macrocode}
407 %
408 % Now we need to do some more calculating (don't you hate it?). As far as
409 % Appendix~G is concerned, $\theta=h(y)=0$, because we want no rule over the
410 % top.
411 %
412 % \begin{macrocode}
413 \@tempdima\ht\tw@%
414 \advance\@tempdima\dp\tw@%
415 \advance\@tempdima-\ht\z@%
416 \advance\@tempdima-\dp\z@%
417 \ifdim\@tempdima>\@tempdimb%
418 \advance\@tempdima\@tempdimb%
419 \@tempdimb.5\@tempdima%
420 \fi%
421 % \end{macrocode}
422 %
423 % Work out how high to raise the radical symbol. Remember that Appendix~G
424 % thinks that the box has a very small height, although this is untrue here.
425 %
426 % \begin{macrocode}
427 \@tempdima\ht\z@%
428 \advance\@tempdima\@tempdimb%
429 \advance\@tempdima-\ht\tw@%
430 % \end{macrocode}
431 %
432 % Build the output (finally). The brace group is there to turn the output
433 % into a mathord, one of the few times that this is actually desirable.
434 %
435 % \begin{macrocode}
436 {\raise\@tempdima\box\tw@\vbox{\kern\@tempdimb\box\z@}}%
437 }
438 % \end{macrocode}
439 %
440 % \end{macro}
441 %
442 % \subsubsection{The new square root command}
443 %
444 % This is where we reimplement all the square root stuff. Most of this stuff
445 % comes from the \PlainTeX\ macros, although some is influenced by \AmSTeX\
446 % and \LaTeXe, and some is original. I've tried to make the spacing vaguely
447 % automatic, so although it's not configurable like \AmSTeX's version, the
448 % output should look nice more of the time. Maybe.
449 %
450 % \begin{macro}{\sqrt}
451 %
452 % \LaTeX\ says this must be robust, so we make it robust. The first thing to
453 % do is to see if there's a star and pass the appropriate squareroot-drawing
454 % command on to the rest of the code.
455 %
456 % \begin{macrocode}
457 \DeclareRobustCommand\sqrt{\@ifstar{\sqrt@i\sqrtdel}{\sqrt@i\sqrtsign}}
458 % \end{macrocode}
459 %
460 % Now we can sort out an optional argument to be displayed on the root.
461 %
462 % \begin{macrocode}
463 \def\sqrt@i#1{\@ifnextchar[{\sqrt@ii{#1}}{\sqrt@iv{#1}}}
464 % \end{macrocode}
465 %
466 % Stages~2 and~3 below are essentially equivalents of \PlainTeX's
467 % |\root|\dots|\of| and |\r@@t|. Here we also find the first wrinkle: the
468 % |\rootbox| used to store the number is spaced out on the left if necessary.
469 % There's a backspace after the end so that the root can slip underneath, and
470 % everything works out nicely. Unfortunately size is fixed here, although
471 % doesn't actually seem to matter.
472 %
473 % \begin{macrocode}
474 \def\sqrt@ii#1[#2]{%
475 \setbox\rootbox\hbox{$\m@th\scriptscriptstyle{#2}$}%
476 \ifdim\wd\rootbox<6\p@%
477 \setbox\rootbox\hb@xt@6\p@{\hfil\unhbox\rootbox}%
478 \fi%
479 \mathpalette{\sqrt@iii{#1}}%
480 }
481 % \end{macrocode}
482 %
483 % Now we can actually build everything. Note that the root is raised by its
484 % depth -- this prevents a common problem with letters with descenders.
485 %
486 % \begin{macrocode}
487 \def\sqrt@iii#1#2#3{%
488 \setbox\z@\hbox{$\m@th#2#1{#3}$}%
489 \dimen@\ht\z@%
490 \advance\dimen@-\dp\z@%
491 \dimen@.6\dimen@%
492 \advance\dimen@\dp\rootbox%
493 \mkern-3mu%
494 \raise\dimen@\copy\rootbox%
495 \mkern-10mu%
496 \box\z@%
497 }
498 % \end{macrocode}
499 %
500 % Finally handle a non-numbered root. We read the rooted text in as an
501 % argument, to stop problems when people omit the braces. (\AmSTeX\ does
502 % this too.)
503 %
504 % \begin{macrocode}
505 \def\sqrt@iv#1#2{#1{#2}}
506 % \end{macrocode}
507 %
508 % \end{macro}
509 %
510 % \begin{macro}{\root}
511 %
512 % We also re-implement \PlainTeX's |\root| command, just in case someone uses
513 % it, and supply a star-variant. This is all very trivial.
514 %
515 % \begin{macrocode}
516 \def\root{\@ifstar{\root@i\sqrtdel}{\root@i\sqrtsign}}
517 \def\root@i#1#2\of{\sqrt@ii{#1}[#2]}
518 % \end{macrocode}
519 %
520 % \end{macro}
521 %
522 % \subsection{Modular programming}
523 %
524 % \begin{macro}{\pmod}
525 %
526 % Do some hacking if not |\ifouter|.
527 %
528 % \begin{macrocode}
529 \def\pmod#1{%
530 \ifinner\;\else\allowbreak\mkern18mu\fi%
531 ({\operator@font mod}\,\,#1)%
532 }
533 % \end{macrocode}
534 %
535 % \end{macro}
536 %
537 % \subsection{Some magic new maths characters}
538 %
539 % \begin{macro}{\bitor}
540 % \begin{macro}{\bitand}
541 % \begin{macro}{\dblor}
542 % \begin{macro}{\dbland}
543 % \begin{macro}{\xor}
544 % \begin{macro}{\lor}
545 % \begin{macro}{\ror}
546 % \begin{macro}{\lsl}
547 % \begin{macro}{\lsr}
548 %
549 % The new boolean operators.
550 %
551 % \begin{macrocode}
552 \DeclareMathSymbol{&}{\mathbin}{operators}{`\&}
553 \DeclareMathSymbol{\bitand}{\mathbin}{operators}{`\&}
554 \def\bitor{\mathbin\mid}
555 \def\dblor{\mathbin{\mid\mid}}
556 \def\dbland{\mathbin{\mathrel\bitand\mathrel\bitand}}
557 \let\xor\oplus
558 \def\lsl{\mathbin{<\!\!<}}
559 \def\lsr{\mathbin{>\!\!>}}
560 \def\rol{\mathbin{<\!\!<\!\!<}}
561 \def\ror{\mathbin{>\!\!>\!\!>}}
562 \AtBeginDocument{\ifx\lll\@@undefined\else
563 \def\lsl{\mathbin{\ll}}
564 \def\lsr{\mathbin{\gg}}
565 \def\rol{\mathbin{\lll}}
566 \def\ror{\mathbin{\ggg}}
567 \fi}
568 % \end{macrocode}
569 %
570 % \end{macro}
571 % \end{macro}
572 % \end{macro}
573 % \end{macro}
574 % \end{macro}
575 % \end{macro}
576 % \end{macro}
577 % \end{macro}
578 % \end{macro}
579 %
580 % \begin{macro}{\cat}
581 % \begin{macro}{\compose}
582 % \begin{macro}{\implies}
583 % \begin{macro}{\vect}
584 % \begin{macro}{\d}
585 % \begin{macro}{\jacobi}
586 %
587 % A mixed bag of stuff.
588 %
589 % \begin{macrocode}
590 \def\cat{\mathbin{\|}}
591 \let\compose\circ
592 \def\implies{\Rightarrow}
593 \def\vect#1{\mathord{\mathbf{#1}}}
594 \def\d{%
595 \ifmmode\mathord{\operator@font d}%
596 \else\expandafter\a\expandafter d\fi%
597 }
598 \def\jacobi#1#2{{{#1}\overwithdelims()#2}}
599 % \end{macrocode}
600 %
601 % \end{macro}
602 % \end{macro}
603 % \end{macro}
604 % \end{macro}
605 % \end{macro}
606 % \end{macro}
607 %
608 % \begin{macro}{\statclose}
609 % \begin{macro}{\compind}
610 %
611 % Fancy new relations for probability distributions.
612 %
613 % \begin{macrocode}
614 \def\statclose{\mathrel{\mathop{=}\limits^{\scriptscriptstyle s}}}
615 \def\compind{\mathrel{\mathop{\approx}\limits^{\scriptscriptstyle c}}}
616 % \end{macrocode}
617 %
618 % \end{macro}
619 % \end{macro}
620 %
621 % \begin{macro}{\defop}
622 % Defining new operator names.
623 % \begin{macrocode}
624 \def\defop{\@ifstar{\defop@\nolimits}{\defop@\limits}}
625 \def\defop@#1#2#3{\def#2{\mathop{\operator@font #3}#1}}
626 % \end{macrocode}
627 % \end{macro}
628 %
629 % \begin{macro}{\keys}
630 % \begin{macro}{\dom}
631 % \begin{macro}{\ran}
632 % \begin{macro}{\supp}
633 % \begin{macro}{\lcm}
634 % \begin{macro}{\poly}
635 % \begin{macro}{\negl}
636 % \begin{macro}{\ord}
637 %
638 % And the new operator names.
639 %
640 % \begin{macrocode}
641 \defop*\keys{keys}
642 \defop*\dom{dom}
643 \defop*\ran{ran}
644 \defop*\supp{supp}
645 \defop*\lcm{lcm}
646 \defop*\poly{poly}
647 \defop*\negl{negl}
648 \defop*\ord{ord}
649 % \end{macrocode}
650 %
651 % \end{macro}
652 % \end{macro}
653 % \end{macro}
654 % \end{macro}
655 % \end{macro}
656 % \end{macro}
657 % \end{macro}
658 % \end{macro}
659 %
660 % \subsection{Fractions}
661 %
662 % \begin{macro}{\@frac@parse}
663 %
664 % \syntax{"\\@frac@parse{"<stuff>"}{"<frac-params>"}"} -- run \<stuff>
665 % passing it three arguments: an infix fraction-making command, the `outer'
666 % style, and the `inner' style.
667 %
668 % This is rather tricky. We clear a load of parameters, parse the parameter
669 % list, and then build a token list containing the right stuff. Without the
670 % token list fiddling, we end up expanding things at the wrong times -- for
671 % example, |\{| expands to something terribly unpleasant in a document
672 % preamble.
673 %
674 % All of the nastiness is contained in a group.
675 %
676 % \begin{macrocode}
677 \def\@frac@parse#1#2{%
678 \begingroup%
679 \let\@wd\@empty\def\@ldel{.}\def\@rdel{.}%
680 \def\@op{over}\let\@dim\@empty\@tempswafalse%
681 \let\@is\@empty\let\@os\@empty%
682 \mkparse{mdwmath:frac}{#2}%
683 \toks\tw@{\endgroup#1}%
684 \toks@\expandafter{\csname @@\@op\@wd\endcsname}%
685 \if@tempswa%
686 \toks@\expandafter{\the\expandafter\toks@\@ldel}%
687 \toks@\expandafter{\the\expandafter\toks@\@rdel}%
688 \fi%
689 \expandafter\toks@\expandafter{\the\expandafter\toks@\@dim}%
690 \toks@\expandafter{\the\toks\expandafter\tw@\expandafter{\the\toks@}}
691 \toks@\expandafter{\the\expandafter\toks@\expandafter{\@os}}
692 \toks@\expandafter{\the\expandafter\toks@\expandafter{\@is}}
693 \the\toks@%
694 }
695 % \end{macrocode}
696 %
697 % The keyword definitions are relatively straightforward now. The error
698 % handling for \textsf{style} and \textsf{innerstyle} could do with
699 % improvement.
700 %
701 % \begin{macrocode}
702 \def\@frac@del#1#2{\def\@wd{withdelims}\@tempswatrue\def#1{#2}}
703 \mkdef{mdwmath:frac}{leftdelim}{\@frac@del\@ldel{#1}}
704 \mkdef{mdwmath:frac}{rightdelim}{\@frac@del\@rdel{#1}}
705 \mkdef{mdwmath:frac}{nodelims}*{\let\@wd\@empty\@tempswafalse}
706 \mkdef{mdwmath:frac}{line}{%
707 \def\@op{above}\setlength\dimen@{#1}\edef\@dim{\the\dimen@\space}%
708 }
709 \mkdef{mdwmath:frac}{line}*{\def\@op{over}\let\@dim\@empty}
710 \mkdef{mdwmath:frac}{noline}*{\def\@op{atop}\let\@dim\@empty}
711 \def\@frac@style#1#2{%
712 \ifx\q@delim#2\q@delim\let#1\@empty%
713 \else%
714 \expandafter\ifx\csname #2style\endcsname\relax%
715 \PackageError{mdwmath}{Bad maths style `#2'}\@ehc%
716 \else%
717 \edef#1{\csname#2style\endcsname}%
718 \fi%
719 \fi%
720 }
721 \mkdef{mdwmath:frac}{style}[]{\@frac@style\@os{#1}}
722 \mkdef{mdwmath:frac}{innerstyle}[]{\@frac@style\@is{#1}}
723 % \end{macrocode}
724 %
725 % \end{macro}
726 %
727 % \begin{macro}{\fracdef}
728 %
729 % Here's where the rest of the pain is. We do a preliminary parse of the
730 % parameters and `compile' the result into the output macro. If there's no
731 % optional argument, then we don't need to do any really tedious formatting
732 % at the point of use.
733 %
734 % \begin{macrocode}
735 \def\fracdef#1#2{\@frac@parse{\fracdef@i{#1}{#2}}{#2}}
736 \def\fracdef@i#1#2#3#4#5{\def#1{\@frac@do{#2}{#3}{#4}{#5}}}
737 \def\@frac@do#1#2#3#4{%
738 \@ifnextchar[{\@frac@complex{#1}}{\@frac@simple{#2}{#3}{#4}}%
739 }
740 \def\@frac@complex#1[#2]{\@frac@parse\@frac@simple{#1,#2}}
741 \def\@frac@simple#1#2#3#4#5{{#2{{#3#4}#1{#3#5}}}}
742 % \end{macrocode}
743 %
744 % \end{macro}
745 %
746 % \begin{macro}{\frac@fix}
747 % \begin{macro}{\@@over}
748 % \begin{macro}{\@@atop}
749 % \begin{macro}{\@@above}
750 % \begin{macro}{\@@overwithdelims}
751 % \begin{macro}{\@@atopwithdelims}
752 % \begin{macro}{\@@abovewithdelims}
753 %
754 % Finally, we need to fix up |\@@over| and friends. Maybe \package{amsmath}
755 % has hidden the commands away somewhere unhelpful. If not, we make the
756 % requisite copies.
757 %
758 % \begin{macrocode}
759 \def\q@delim{\q@delim}
760 \def\frac@fix#1{\expandafter\frac@fix@i\string#1\q@delim}
761 \def\frac@fix@i#1#2\q@delim{\frac@fix@ii{#2}\frac@fix@ii{#2withdelims}}
762 \def\frac@fix@ii#1{%
763 \expandafter\ifx\csname @@#1\endcsname\relax%
764 \expandafter\let\csname @@#1\expandafter\endcsname\csname#1\endcsname%
765 \fi%
766 }
767 \frac@fix\over \frac@fix\atop \frac@fix\above
768 % \end{macrocode}
769 %
770 % \end{macro}
771 % \end{macro}
772 % \end{macro}
773 % \end{macro}
774 % \end{macro}
775 % \end{macro}
776 % \end{macro}
777 %
778 % \begin{macro}{\frac}
779 % \begin{macro}{\binom}
780 % \begin{macro}{\jacobi}
781 %
782 % And finally, we define the fraction-making commands.
783 %
784 % \begin{macrocode}
785 \fracdef\frac{nodelims, line}
786 \fracdef\binom{leftdelim = (, rightdelim = ), noline}
787 \fracdef\jacobi{leftdelim = (, rightdelim = ), line}
788 % \end{macrocode}
789 %
790 % \end{macro}
791 % \end{macro}
792 % \end{macro}
793 %
794 % \subsection{Blackboard bold stuff}
795 %
796 % \begin{macro}{\Z}
797 % \begin{macro}{\Q}
798 % \begin{macro}{\R}
799 % \begin{macro}{\C}
800 % \begin{macro}{\N}
801 % \begin{macro}{\F}
802 % \begin{macro}{\powerset}
803 % \begin{macro}{\gf}
804 %
805 % First of all, the signs.
806 %
807 % \begin{macrocode}
808 \def\Z{\mathbb{Z}}
809 \def\Q{\mathbb{Q}}
810 \def\R{\mathbb{R}}
811 \def\C{\mathbb{C}}
812 \def\N{\mathbb{N}}
813 \def\F{\mathbb{F}}
814 \def\powerset{\mathbb{P}}
815 \def\gf#1{\F_{#1}}
816 %\def\gf#1{\mathrm{GF}({#1})}
817 % \end{macrocode}
818 %
819 % \end{macro}
820 % \end{macro}
821 % \end{macro}
822 % \end{macro}
823 % \end{macro}
824 % \end{macro}
825 % \end{macro}
826 % \end{macro}
827 %
828 % And now, define |\mathbb| if it's not there already.
829 %
830 % \begin{macrocode}
831 \AtBeginDocument{\ifx\mathbb\@@undefined\let\mathbb\mathbf\fi}
832 % \end{macrocode}
833 %
834 % \subsection{Biggles}
835 %
836 % Now for some user-controlled delimiter sizing. The standard bigness of
837 % plain \TeX's delimiters are all right, but it's a little limiting.
838 %
839 % The biggness of delimiters is based on the size of the current |\strut|,
840 % which \LaTeX\ keeps up to date all the time. This will make the various
841 % delimiters grow in proportion when the text gets bigger. Actually, I'm
842 % not sure that this is exactly right -- maybe it should be nonlinear,
843 %
844 % \begin{macro}{\bbigg}
845 % \begin{macro}{\bbiggl}
846 % \begin{macro}{\bbiggr}
847 % \begin{macro}{\bbiggm}
848 %
849 % This is where the bigness is done. This is more similar to the plain \TeX\
850 % big delimiter stuff than to the \package{amsmath} stuff, although there's
851 % not really a lot of difference.
852 %
853 % The two arguments are a multiplier for the delimiter size, and a small
854 % increment applied \emph{before} the multiplication (which is optional).
855 %
856 % This is actually a front for a low-level interface which can be called
857 % directly for efficiency.
858 %
859 % \begin{macrocode}
860 \def\bbigg{\@bbigg\mathord} \def\bbiggl{\@bbigg\mathopen}
861 \def\bbiggr{\@bbigg\mathclose} \def\bbiggm{\@bbigg\mathrel}
862 % \end{macrocode}
863 %
864 % \end{macro}
865 % \end{macro}
866 % \end{macro}
867 % \end{macro}
868 %
869 % \begin{macro}{\@bbigg}
870 %
871 % This is an optional argument parser providing a front end for the main
872 % macro |\bbigg@|.
873 %
874 % \begin{macrocode}
875 \def\@bbigg#1{\@testopt{\@bbigg@i{#1}}\z@}
876 \def\@bbigg@i#1[#2]{#1{\bbigg@{#2}}}
877 % \end{macrocode}
878 %
879 % \end{macro}
880 %
881 % \begin{macro}{\bbigg@}
882 %
883 % This is it, at last. The arguments are as described above: an addition
884 % to be made to the strut height, and a multiplier. Oh, and the delimiter,
885 % of course.
886 %
887 % This is a bit messy. The smallest `big' delimiter, |\big|, is the same
888 % height as the current strut box. Other delimiters are~$1\frac12$, $2$
889 % and~$2\frac12$ times this height. I'll set the height of the delimiter by
890 % putting in a |\vcenter| of the appropriate size.
891 %
892 % Given an extra height~$x$, a multiplication factor~$f$ and a strut
893 % height~$h$ and depth~$d$, I'll create a vcenter with total height
894 % $f(h+d+x)$. Easy, isn't it?
895 %
896 % \begin{macrocode}
897 \def\bbigg@#1#2#3{%
898 {\hbox{$%
899 \dimen@\ht\strutbox\advance\dimen@\dp\strutbox%
900 \advance\dimen@#1%
901 \dimen@#2\dimen@%
902 \left#3\vcenter to\dimen@{}\right.\n@space%
903 $}}%
904 }
905 % \end{macrocode}
906 %
907 % \end{macro}
908 %
909 % \begin{macro}{\big}
910 % \begin{macro}{\Big}
911 % \begin{macro}{\bigg}
912 % \begin{macro}{\Bigg}
913 %
914 % Now for the easy macros.
915 %
916 % \begin{macrocode}
917 \def\big{\bbigg@\z@\@ne}
918 \def\Big{\bbigg@\z@{1.5}}
919 \def\bigg{\bbigg@\z@\tw@}
920 \def\Bigg{\bbigg@\z@{2.5}}
921 % \end{macrocode}
922 %
923 % \end{macro}
924 % \end{macro}
925 % \end{macro}
926 % \end{macro}
927 %
928 % \subsection{The `QED' symbol}
929 %
930 % \begin{macro}{\qed}
931 % \begin{macro}{\qedrule}
932 % \begin{macro}{\qedsymbol}
933 %
934 % This is fairly simple. Just be careful will the glue and penalties. The
935 % size of the little box is based on the current font size.
936 %
937 % The horizontal list constructed by the macro is like this:
938 %
939 % \begin{itemize}
940 % \item A |\quad| of space. This might get eaten if there's a break here or
941 % before. That's OK, though.
942 % \item An empty box, to break a run of discardable items.
943 % \item A |\penalty 10000| to ensure that the spacing glue isn't discarded.
944 % \item |\hfill| glue to push the little rule to the end of the line.
945 % \item A little square rule `\qedrule', with some small kerns around it.
946 % \item A glue item to counter the effect of glue added at the paragraph
947 % boundary.
948 % \end{itemize}
949 %
950 % The vertical mode case is simpler, but less universal. It copes with
951 % relatively simple cases only.
952 %
953 % A |\qed| commend ends the paragraph.
954 %
955 % \begin{macrocode}
956 \def\qed{%
957 \ifvmode%
958 \unskip%
959 \setbox\z@\hb@xt@\linewidth{\hfil\strut\qedsymbol}%
960 \prevdepth-\@m\p@%
961 \ifdim\prevdepth>\dp\strutbox%
962 \dimen@\prevdepth\advance\dimen@-\dp\strutbox%
963 \kern-\dimen@%
964 \fi%
965 \penalty\@M\vskip-\baselineskip\box\z@%
966 \else%
967 \unskip%
968 \penalty\@M\hfill%
969 \hbox{}\penalty200\quad%
970 \hbox{}\penalty\@M\hfill\qedsymbol\hskip-\parfillskip\par%
971 \fi%
972 }
973 \def\qedrule{{%
974 \dimen@\ht\strutbox%
975 \advance\dimen@\dp\strutbox%
976 \dimen@ii1ex%
977 \advance\dimen@-\dimen@ii%
978 \divide\dimen@\tw@%
979 \advance\dimen@-\dp\strutbox%
980 \advance\dimen@\dimen@ii%
981 \advance\dimen@ii-\dimen@%
982 \kern\p@%
983 \vrule\@width1ex\@height\dimen@\@depth\dimen@ii%
984 \kern\p@%
985 }}
986 \providecommand\qedsymbol{\qedrule}
987 % \end{macrocode}
988 %
989 % \end{macro}
990 % \end{macro}
991 % \end{macro}
992 %
993 % \subsection{Punctuation in displays}
994 %
995 % \begin{macro}{\mpunct}
996 %
997 % This is actually a little more subtle than you'd expect. If the
998 % \package{amstext} package is loaded, or something else has defined the
999 % |\text| command, then we should use that; otherwise, just drop a box in and
1000 % hope for the best.
1001 %
1002 % \begin{macrocode}
1003 \def\mpunct#1{%
1004 \,%
1005 \ifx\text\@@undefined\hbox%
1006 \else\expandafter\text\fi%
1007 {#1}%
1008 }
1009 % \end{macrocode}
1010 %
1011 %\end{macro}
1012 %
1013 % That's all there is. Byebye.
1014 %
1015 % \begin{macrocode}
1016 %</package>
1017 % \end{macrocode}
1018 %
1019 % \hfill Mark Wooding, \today
1020 %
1021 % \Finale
1022 \endinput