symm/{chacha,salsa20}-x86ish-sse2.S: Fix typo in commentary.

diff --git a/symm/chacha-x86ish-sse2.S b/symm/chacha-x86ish-sse2.S
index 0989fd4..2dab283 100644 (file)
--- a/symm/chacha-x86ish-sse2.S
+++ b/symm/chacha-x86ish-sse2.S
@@ -42,12 +42,12 @@ FUNC(chacha_core_x86ish_sse2)
 
 #if CPUFAM_X86
        // Arguments come in on the stack, and will need to be collected.  We
-       // we can get away with just the scratch registers for integer work,
-       // but we'll run out of XMM registers and will need some properly
-       // aligned space which we'll steal from the stack.  I don't trust the
-       // stack pointer's alignment, so I'll have to mask the stack pointer,
-       // which in turn means I'll need to keep track of the old value.
-       // Hence I'm making a full i386-style stack frame here.
+       // can get away with just the scratch registers for integer work, but
+       // we'll run out of XMM registers and will need some properly aligned
+       // space which we'll steal from the stack.  I don't trust the stack
+       // pointer's alignment, so I'll have to mask the stack pointer, which
+       // in turn means I'll need to keep track of the old value.  Hence I'm
+       // making a full i386-style stack frame here.
        //
        // The Windows and SysV ABIs are sufficiently similar that we don't
        // need to worry about the differences here.

diff --git a/symm/salsa20-x86ish-sse2.S b/symm/salsa20-x86ish-sse2.S
index ca677f1..9cbaeff 100644 (file)
--- a/symm/salsa20-x86ish-sse2.S
+++ b/symm/salsa20-x86ish-sse2.S
@@ -42,12 +42,12 @@ FUNC(salsa20_core_x86ish_sse2)
 
 #if CPUFAM_X86
        // Arguments come in on the stack, and will need to be collected.  We
-       // we can get away with just the scratch registers for integer work,
-       // but we'll run out of XMM registers and will need some properly
-       // aligned space which we'll steal from the stack.  I don't trust the
-       // stack pointer's alignment, so I'll have to mask the stack pointer,
-       // which in turn means I'll need to keep track of the old value.
-       // Hence I'm making a full i386-style stack frame here.
+       // can get away with just the scratch registers for integer work, but
+       // we'll run out of XMM registers and will need some properly aligned
+       // space which we'll steal from the stack.  I don't trust the stack
+       // pointer's alignment, so I'll have to mask the stack pointer, which
+       // in turn means I'll need to keep track of the old value.  Hence I'm
+       // making a full i386-style stack frame here.
        //
        // The Windows and SysV ABIs are sufficiently similar that we don't
        // need to worry about the differences here.