Update a couple of bits of the FAQ. We do now default to SSH2, and

we do have a Unix port of PuTTY proper.

git-svn-id: svn://svn.tartarus.org/sgt/putty@3200 cda61777-01e9-0310-a592-d414129be87e

diff --git a/doc/faq.but b/doc/faq.but
index 10a9820..2068bee 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/faq.but
+++ b/doc/faq.but
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-\versionid $Id: faq.but,v 1.46 2003/03/29 01:44:39 owen Exp $
+\versionid $Id: faq.but,v 1.47 2003/05/22 08:43:50 simon Exp $

 
 \A{faq} PuTTY FAQ
 
 
 \A{faq} PuTTY FAQ
 


@@ -28,11 +28,6 @@ implemented.
 \S{faq-ssh2}{Question} Does PuTTY support SSH v2?
 
 Yes. SSH v2 support has been available in PuTTY since version 0.50.
 \S{faq-ssh2}{Question} Does PuTTY support SSH v2?
 
 Yes. SSH v2 support has been available in PuTTY since version 0.50.

-However, currently the \e{default} SSH protocol is v1; to select SSH
-v2 if your server supports both, go to the SSH panel and change the
-\e{Preferred SSH protocol version} option. (The factory default will
-\W{http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist/ssh2-default.html}{change to v2}
-in the next full release.)

 
 Public key authentication (both RSA and DSA) in SSH v2 is new in
 version 0.52.
 
 Public key authentication (both RSA and DSA) in SSH v2 is new in
 version 0.52.


@@ -194,16 +189,10 @@ or any other port of PuTTY, they were mistaken. We don't.
 
 It's currently being worked on. If you look at the nightly source
 snapshots, you should find a \c{unix} subdirectory, which should
 
 It's currently being worked on. If you look at the nightly source
 snapshots, you should find a \c{unix} subdirectory, which should

-build you a Unix port of Plink, and also \c{pterm} - an
+build you Unix ports of Plink, PuTTY itself, and also \c{pterm} - an

 \cw{xterm}-type program which supports the same terminal emulation
 \cw{xterm}-type program which supports the same terminal emulation

-as PuTTY.
-
-It isn't yet clear whether we will bother combining the terminal
-emulator and network back end into the same process, to provide a
-Unix port of the full GUI form of PuTTY. It wouldn't be as useful a
-thing on Unix as it would be on Windows; its major value would
-probably be as a pathfinding effort for other ports. If anyone
-really wants it, we'd be interested to know why :-)
+as PuTTY. We do not yet have Unix ports of PSCP, PSFTP, Pageant or
+PuTTYgen.

 
 \S{faq-wince}{Question} Will there be a port to Windows CE or PocketPC?
 
 
 \S{faq-wince}{Question} Will there be a port to Windows CE or PocketPC?