Don't send an immediate challenge to the peer; instead, wait until it
sends us something before responding.
.TP
+.B "\-ephemeral"
+The association with the peer is not intended to persist indefinitely.
+If a peer marked as ephemeral is killed, or the
+.BR tripe (8)
+daemon is shut down, send a
+.B bye
+packet to the peer so that it forgets about us; if a peer marked as
+ephemeral sends us a
+.B bye
+packet then it is killed (but in this case no further
+.B bye
+packet is sent). Peers not marked as ephemeral exhibit neither of these
+behaviours; each peer must have the other marked as ephemeral for the
+association to be fully torn down if either end kills the other.
+.TP
.BI "\-keepalive " time
Send a no-op packet if we've not sent a packet to the peer in the last
.I time
to authenticate the peer. The default is to use the key tagged
.IR peer .
.TP
+.BI "\-knock \fR[" prefix .\fR] tag
+Send the string
+.RI [ prefix\fB. ] tag
+in
+.B token-rq
+and
+.B knock
+messages to the peer during key-exchange. The string as a whole should
+name the local machine to the peer, and
+.I tag
+should name its public key. When such messages are received from a
+currently unknown peer,
+.BR tripe (8)
+emits a
+.B KNOCK
+notification stating the peer's (claimed) name and address. The server
+will already have verified that the sender is using the peer's private
+key by this point. This option implies
+.BR \-ephemeral .
+.TP
.B "\-mobile"
The peer is a mobile device, and is likely to change address rapidly.
If a packet arrives from an unknown address, the server's usual response
and if one succeeds, the server will update its idea of the peer's
address and emit an
.B NEWADDR
-notification.
+notification. This option implies
+.BR \-ephemeral .
.TP
.BI "\-priv " tag
Use the private key
The keepalive interval, in seconds, or zero if no keepalives are to be
sent.
.TP
+.B knock
+If present, the string sent to the peer to set up the association; see
+the
+.B \-knock
+option to
+.BR ADD ,
+and the
+.B KNOCK
+notification.
+.TP
.B key
The (short) key tag being used for the peer, as passed to the
.B ADD
.B nil
depending on whether or not (respectively) the peer is expected to
change its address unpredictably.
+.TP
+.B ephemeral
+Either
+.B t
+or
+.B nil
+depending on whether the association with the peer is expected to be
+temporary or persistent (respectively).
.RE
.SP
.BI "PING \fR[" options "\fR] " peer
.I peer
has been killed.
.SP
+.BI "KNOCK " peer " " address
+The currently unknown
+.I peer
+is attempting to connect from
+.IR address .
+.SP
.BI "KXDONE " peer
Key exchange with
.I peer
.I tag
couldn't be found in the keyring.
.SP
+.BI "KEYMGMT " which "-keyring " file " unknown-key-id 0x" keyid
+A key with the given
+.I keyid
+(in hex) was requested but not found.
+.SP
.BI "KEYMGMT " which "-keyring " file " line " line " " message
The contents of the keyring file are invalid. There may well be a bug
in the
.BR challenge ,
.BR reply ,
.BR switch-rq ,
-or
.BR switch-ok .
+.BR token-rq ,
+.BR token ,
+or
+.BR knock .
.SP
.BI "KX " peer " algorithms-mismatch local-private-key " privtag " peer-public-key " pubtag
The algorithms specified in the peer's public key
An error occurred attempting to send a network packet. We lost that
one.
.SP
+.BI "PEER " address\fR... " socket-write-error " ecode " " message
+An error occurred attempting to send a network packet. We lost that
+one.
+.SP
.BI "PEER " peer " unexpected-encrypted-ping 0x" id
The peer sent an encrypted ping response whose id doesn't match any
outstanding ping. Maybe it was delayed for longer than the server was
~mdw / tripe / blobdiff