From cb89ba784ac3324c5755666144fc871f15c6e884 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: jacob Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 21:24:10 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Mention Links page in ports section, since there are now a number of third-party ports git-svn-id: svn://svn.tartarus.org/sgt/putty@3921 cda61777-01e9-0310-a592-d414129be87e --- doc/faq.but | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/faq.but b/doc/faq.but index 92c7efbe..e75f9ca4 100644 --- a/doc/faq.but +++ b/doc/faq.but @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -\versionid $Id: faq.but,v 1.61 2004/02/23 19:10:43 jacob Exp $ +\versionid $Id: faq.but,v 1.62 2004/03/04 21:24:10 jacob Exp $ \A{faq} PuTTY FAQ @@ -213,6 +213,9 @@ We do not have release-quality ports for any other systems at the present time. If anyone told you we had an EPOC port, or an iPaq port, or any other port of PuTTY, they were mistaken. We don't. +There are some third-party ports to various platforms, mentioned +on the Links page of our website. + \S{faq-unix}{Question} Is there a port to Unix? As of 0.54, there are Unix ports of most of the traditional PuTTY -- 2.11.0