From aff5267a8b6e85faa1c5998e0719a7b20f185d64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: simon Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 13:52:05 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Add a general `what ports exist?' question to the FAQ, so that the next person who asks us whether we have a port for ${random_palmtop} can be treated with the contempt they deserve. git-svn-id: svn://svn.tartarus.org/sgt/putty@1555 cda61777-01e9-0310-a592-d414129be87e --- doc/faq.but | 16 +++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/faq.but b/doc/faq.but index 5405bcca..3ceb4fce 100644 --- a/doc/faq.but +++ b/doc/faq.but @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -\versionid $Id: faq.but,v 1.19 2002/01/23 09:43:10 simon Exp $ +\versionid $Id: faq.but,v 1.20 2002/02/04 13:52:05 simon Exp $ \A{faq} PuTTY FAQ @@ -180,6 +180,20 @@ under X11 or perhaps other windowing systems, whereas Telnet Passive Mode is universal and shouldn't need to be specified once for each platform. +\S{faq-ports-general}{Question} What ports of PuTTY exist? + +Currently, PuTTY only runs on full Win32 systems. This includes +Windows 95, 98, and ME, and it includes Windows NT, Windows 2000 and +Windows XP. + +It does \e{not} include Windows CE (see \k{faq-wince}), and it does +not quite include the Win32s environment under Windows 3.1 (see +\k{faq-win31}). + +We do not have ports for any other systems at the present time. If +anyone told you we had a Unix port, or an iPaq port, or any other +port of PuTTY, they were mistaken. We don't. + \S{faq-wince}{Question} Will there be a port to Windows CE? Probably not in the particularly near future. Despite sharing large -- 2.11.0