-\versionid $Id: faq.but,v 1.45 2003/03/04 14:14:17 ben Exp $
+\versionid $Id: faq.but,v 1.47 2003/05/22 08:43:50 simon Exp $
\A{faq} PuTTY FAQ
\S{faq-ssh2}{Question} Does PuTTY support SSH v2?
Yes. SSH v2 support has been available in PuTTY since version 0.50.
-However, currently the \e{default} SSH protocol is v1; to select SSH
-v2 if your server supports both, go to the SSH panel and change the
-\e{Preferred SSH protocol version} option. (The factory default will
-\W{http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist/ssh2-default.html}{change to v2}
-in the next full release.)
Public key authentication (both RSA and DSA) in SSH v2 is new in
version 0.52.
It's currently being worked on. If you look at the nightly source
snapshots, you should find a \c{unix} subdirectory, which should
-build you a Unix port of Plink, and also \c{pterm} - an
+build you Unix ports of Plink, PuTTY itself, and also \c{pterm} - an
\cw{xterm}-type program which supports the same terminal emulation
-as PuTTY.
-
-It isn't yet clear whether we will bother combining the terminal
-emulator and network back end into the same process, to provide a
-Unix port of the full GUI form of PuTTY. It wouldn't be as useful a
-thing on Unix as it would be on Windows; its major value would
-probably be as a pathfinding effort for other ports. If anyone
-really wants it, we'd be interested to know why :-)
+as PuTTY. We do not yet have Unix ports of PSCP, PSFTP, Pageant or
+PuTTYgen.
\S{faq-wince}{Question} Will there be a port to Windows CE or PocketPC?
-Probably not in the particularly near future. Despite sharing large
-parts of the Windows API, in practice WinCE doesn't appear to be
-significantly easier to port to than a totally different operating
-system.
-
-However, PuTTY on portable devices would clearly be a useful thing,
-so in the long term I hope there will be a WinCE port.
+It's currently being worked on, but it's only in its early stages yet,
+and certainly isn't yet useful. PuTTY on portable devices would
+clearly be a useful thing, so in the long term I hope it can be
+brought up to release quality.
\S{faq-win31}{Question} Is there a port to Windows 3.1?
\S{faq-mac-port}{Question} Will there be a port to the Mac?
-Eventually. The terminal emulation code has been ported, as has the
-saved-settings infrastructure, but networking and a configuration GUI
-still need to be done before the port will be of any use.
+There is a port to the Mac OS in progress. It's just about usable, but
+has an awful lot of gaps and rough edges that will need cleaning up
+before release.
\S{faq-epoc}{Question} Will there be a port to EPOC?
for, it might be a long time before any of us get round to learning
a new system and doing the port for that.
+However, some of the work has been done by other people, and a beta
+port of PuTTY for the Nokia 9200 Communicator series is available
+from \W{http://www.s2.org/putty/}\cw{http://www.s2.org/putty/}
+
\H{faq-embedding} Embedding PuTTY in other programs
\S{faq-dll}{Question} Is the SSH or Telnet code available as a DLL?
~mdw / sgt / putty / blobdiff