-\versionid $Id: feedback.but,v 1.9 2002/11/23 11:22:57 jacob Exp $
+\versionid $Id: feedback.but,v 1.12 2003/01/24 14:12:31 jacob Exp $
\A{feedback} Feedback and bug reporting
Also, the archives aren't publicly available, so you shouldn't be
letting yourself in for any spam by sending us mail.
+Please use a meaningful subject line on your message. We get a lot of
+mail, and it's hard to find the message we're looking for if they all
+have subject lines like \q{PuTTY bug}.
+
\S{feedback-largefiles} Sending large attachments
Since the PuTTY contact address is a mailing list, e-mails larger
be:
\b Check the
-\W{http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist.html}{Wishlist
+\W{http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist/}{Wishlist
page} on the PuTTY website, and see if we already know about the
problem. If we do, it is almost certainly not necessary to mail us
about it, unless you think you have extra information that might be
you should do are:
\b Check the
-\W{http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist.html}{Wishlist
+\W{http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist/}{Wishlist
page} on the PuTTY website, and see if your feature is already on
the list. If it is, it probably won't achieve very much to repeat
the request. (But see \k{feedback-feature-priority} if you want to
Wishlist). This probably won't have very \e{much} effect; if a huge
number of people vote for something then it may make a difference,
but one or two extra votes for a particular feature are unlikely to
-change our priority list immediately. Also, don't expect a reply.
+change our priority list immediately. Offering a new and compelling
+justification might help. Also, don't expect a reply.
\b Offer us money if we do the work sooner rather than later. This
sometimes works, but not always. The PuTTY team all have full-time