In the config dialog, clip RGB values to [0..255] rather than reducing them

[sgt/putty] / doc / faq.but

diff --git a/doc/faq.but b/doc/faq.but
index 02a2be0..e0b7df9 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/faq.but
+++ b/doc/faq.but
@@ -55,7 +55,9 @@ version 0.52.
 \S{faq-ssh2-keyfmt}{Question} Does PuTTY support reading OpenSSH or
 \cw{ssh.com} SSH-2 private key files?
 
 \S{faq-ssh2-keyfmt}{Question} Does PuTTY support reading OpenSSH or
 \cw{ssh.com} SSH-2 private key files?
 

-PuTTY doesn't support this natively, but as of 0.53
+PuTTY doesn't support this natively (see
+\W{http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist/key-formats-natively.html}{the wishlist entry}
+for reasons why not), but as of 0.53

 PuTTYgen can convert both OpenSSH and \cw{ssh.com} private key
 files into PuTTY's format.
 
 PuTTYgen can convert both OpenSSH and \cw{ssh.com} private key
 files into PuTTY's format.
 


@@ -266,13 +268,12 @@ expect our Unix port to be the right thing for everybody.
 
 \S{faq-wince}{Question} Will there be a port to Windows CE or PocketPC?
 
 
 \S{faq-wince}{Question} Will there be a port to Windows CE or PocketPC?
 

-It's currently being worked on, but it's only in its early stages yet,
-and certainly isn't yet useful.  PuTTY on portable devices would
-clearly be a useful thing, so in the long term I hope it can be
-brought up to release quality.
+We have done some work on such a port, but it only reached an early
+stage, and certainly not a useful one. It's no longer being actively
+worked on.

 
 

-There's also a third-party port at
-\W{http://pocketputty.duxy.net/}\c{http://pocketputty.duxy.net/}.
+However, there's a third-party port at
+\W{http://www.pocketputty.net/}\c{http://www.pocketputty.net/}.

 
 \S{faq-win31}{Question} Is there a port to \i{Windows 3.1}?
 
 
 \S{faq-win31}{Question} Is there a port to \i{Windows 3.1}?
 


@@ -1381,6 +1382,22 @@ closed-source and someone made an open-source fork, most people
 would switch to the latter. Therefore, it would be pretty stupid of
 us to try it.)
 
 would switch to the latter. Therefore, it would be pretty stupid of
 us to try it.)
 

+\S{faq-export-cert}{Question} Can you provide us with export control
+information / FIPS certification for PuTTY?
+
+Some people have asked us for an Export Control Classification Number
+(ECCN) for PuTTY.  We don't know whether we have one, and as a team of
+free software developers based in the UK we don't have the time,
+money, or effort to deal with US bureaucracy to investigate any
+further.  We believe that PuTTY falls under 5D002 on the US Commerce
+Control List, but that shouldn't be taken as definitive.  If you need
+to know more you should seek professional legal advice.  The same
+applies to any other country's legal requirements and restrictions.
+
+Similarly, some people have asked us for FIPS certification of the
+PuTTY tools.  Unless someone else is prepared to do the necessary work
+and pay any costs, we can't provide this.
+

 \H{faq-misc} Miscellaneous questions
 
 \S{faq-openssh}{Question} Is PuTTY a port of \i{OpenSSH}, or based on
 \H{faq-misc} Miscellaneous questions
 
 \S{faq-openssh}{Question} Is PuTTY a port of \i{OpenSSH}, or based on