I think the time has come for PuTTYgen to mention "authorized_keys" instead

[sgt/putty] / doc / feedback.but

diff --git a/doc/feedback.but b/doc/feedback.but
index 9c34ae3..a818cba 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/feedback.but
+++ b/doc/feedback.but
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-\versionid $Id: feedback.but,v 1.13 2003/06/06 18:16:52 ben Exp $
+\versionid $Id: feedback.but,v 1.15 2003/09/23 10:12:02 jacob Exp $
 
 \A{feedback} Feedback and bug reporting
 
@@ -133,6 +133,8 @@ delayed and it may not be obvious which version was the latest at
 the time you sent the message. 
 
 \b Tell us what version of what OS you are running PuTTY on.
+(If you're running on Windows for Alpha, tell us, or we'll assume
+you're running on Intel as this is overwhelmingly the case.)
 
 \b Tell us what protocol you are connecting with: SSH, Telnet,
 Rlogin or Raw mode.
@@ -195,7 +197,7 @@ the list. If it is, it probably won't achieve very much to repeat
 the request. (But see \k{feedback-feature-priority} if you want to
 persuade us to give your particular feature higher priority.)
 
-\b Check the
+\b Check the Wishlist and
 \W{http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/changes.html}{Change
 Log} on the PuTTY website, and see if we have already added your
 feature in the development snapshots. If it isn't clear, download