X-Git-Url: https://git.distorted.org.uk/~mdw/sgt/halibut/blobdiff_plain/b9e27ab606985162d9b7168c9e0b6fc2a3df4579..0dfaac7284d7f1a54e957bba4a881d93328c1630:/inputs/test.but diff --git a/inputs/test.but b/inputs/test.but index 72f8719..dddc2dd 100644 --- a/inputs/test.but +++ b/inputs/test.but @@ -12,10 +12,12 @@ backend has to treat it specially in order to pass it to pdfmark. \cfg{info-dir-entry}{Sillinesses}{test.but}{Halibut test document} \cfg{info-dir-entry}{Florbles}{test.but}{Subsection of Halibut test document}{sub-sub} +\cfg{info-section-underline}{2}{~} +\cfg{info-charset}{utf-8} \cfg{man-headnumbers}{true} -\cfg{contents}{Contents(edited)} -\cfg{index}{Index(alsoedited)} +\cfg{contents}{Contents - edited title} +\cfg{index}{Index - also edited title} This paragraph is not labelled \q{preamble}, but should still appear as it. @@ -85,6 +87,8 @@ Here's a code paragraph: \c We can use discretionary bold and italic in code paragraphs! \e bbbb iiiiii \c Isn't that ludicrous? +\c +\c man page tricky characters: command -o 'quoted' -o `backticks` This is a list: @@ -244,6 +248,16 @@ u \cfg{input-charset}{ASCII} +Testing ligatures in normal (fi), empasised (\e{fi}), code (\c{fi}) and +weak code (\cw{fi}). The latter two should not be ligated. + +\c Also in a code paragraph (fi) with bold (fi) and italic (fi). +\e bb ii +\c There should be no ligation there. + +The following pair of characters map to different glyphs with the same name in +some Microsoft TrueType fonts: \u0394{(missing)} \u2206{(missing)} + \S{subhead} First subheading So here's a \I{subheading}\I{subsection}subsection. Just @@ -264,6 +278,11 @@ Similarly, we should support things like hyperlinks and \e{in the \W{http://www.tartarus.org/}{middle} of them}, and also \e{at the \W{http://home.att.net/~cecw/lastpage.htm}{end}}. +Here's a hyperlink containing some special characters: +\W{http://ad/}{here}. (Not that it'll \e{work}, but you can at +least determine that it's been correctly escaped by inspection of +the output HTML.) + \#{FIXME: Unfortunately, we still don't quite do the right thing with references: How about a \e{reference to \k{subhead} here}? And at