TODO list for agedu
===================
-Before it's non-embarrassingly releasable:
-
- - now we have a configure framework, actually use it to:
- * configure use of stat64
- * configure use of Linux syscall magic replacing readdir
- + later glibcs have fdopendir, hooray! So we can use that
- too, if it's available and O_NOATIME is too.
-
-Future possibilities:
+ - we could still be using more of the information coming from
+ autoconf. Our config.h is defining a whole bunch of HAVE_FOOs for
+ particular functions (e.g. HAVE_INET_NTOA, HAVE_MEMCHR,
+ HAVE_FNMATCH). We could usefully supply alternatives for some of
+ these functions (e.g. cannibalise the PuTTY wildcard matcher for
+ use in the absence of fnmatch, switch to vanilla truncate() in
+ the absence of ftruncate); where we don't have alternative code,
+ it would perhaps be polite to throw an error at configure time
+ rather than allowing the subsequent build to fail.
+ + however, I don't see anything here that looks very
+ controversial; IIRC it's all in POSIX, for one thing. So more
+ likely this should simply wait until somebody complains.
- IPv6 support in the HTTP server
* of course, Linux magic auth can still work in this context; we
Unclear what the right UI would be on Windows, too;
command-line exactly as now might be considered just a
_little_ unfriendly. Or perhaps not.
+ * Disk scan procedure: the FindFirstFile / FindNextFile
+ functions to scan a directory automatically return the file
+ times along with the filenames, so there's no need to stat
+ them later. Would want to fiddle the shape of the
+ abstraction layer to reflect this.
+ Alternatively, a much easier approach would be to write a
Windows version of just the --scan-dump mode, which does a
filesystem scan via the Windows API and generates a valid
agedu dump file on standard output. Then one would simply feed
that over the network connection of one's choice to the rest
of agedu running on Unix as usual.
+
+ - it might conceivably be useful to support a choice of indexing
+ strategies. The current "continuous index" mechanism' tradeoff of
+ taking O(N log N) space in order to be able to support any age
+ cutoff you like is not going to be ideal for everybody. A second
+ more conventional "discrete index" mechanism which allows the
+ user to specify a number of fixed cutoffs and just indexes each
+ directory on those alone would undoubtedly be a useful thing for
+ large-scale users. This will require considerable thought about
+ how to make the indexers pluggable at both index-generation time
+ and query time.
+ * however, now we have the cut-down version of the continuous
+ index, the space saving is less compelling.
~mdw / sgt / agedu / blobdiff