debian/rules: Use `git' potty wrapper.
[qmail] / BLURB4
CommitLineData
2117e02e
MW
1qmail's modular, lightweight design and sensible queue management make
2it the fastest available message transfer agent. Here's how it stacks up
3against the competition in five different speed measurements.
4
5* Scheduling: I sent a message to 8192 ``trash'' recipients on my home
6machine. All the deliveries were done in a mere 78 seconds---a rate of
212b6f5d 7over 9 million deliveries a day! Compare this to the speed advertised
2117e02e
MW
8for Zmailer's scheduling: 1.1 million deliveries a day on a
9SparcStation-10/50. (My home machine is a 16MB Pentium-100 under BSD/OS,
10with the default qmail configuration. qmail's logs were piped through
11accustamp and written to disk as usual.)
12
13* Local mailing lists: When qmail is delivering a message to a mailbox,
14it physically writes the message to disk before it announces success---
15that way, mail doesn't get lost if the power goes out. I tried sending a
16message to 1024 local mailboxes on the same disk on my home machine; all
212b6f5d 17the deliveries were done in 25.5 seconds. That's more than 3.4 million
2117e02e
MW
18deliveries a day! Sending 1024 copies to a _single_ mailbox was just as
19fast. Compare these figures to Zmailer's advertised rate for throwing
20recipients away without even delivering the message---only 0.48 million
21per day on the SparcStation.
22
23* Mailing lists with remote recipients: qmail uses the same delivery
24strategy that makes LSOFT's LSMTP so fast for outgoing mailing lists---
25you choose how many parallel SMTP connections you want to run, and qmail
26runs exactly that many. Of course, performance varies depending on how
27far away your recipients are. The advantage of qmail over other packages
28is its smallness: for example, one Linux user is running 60 simultaneous
29connections, without swapping, on a machine with just 16MB of memory!
30
31* Separate local messages: What LSOFT doesn't tell you about LSMTP is
32how many _separate_ messages it can handle in a day. Does it get bogged
33down as the queue fills up? On my home machine, I disabled qmail's
34deliveries and then sent 5000 separate messages to one recipient. The
35messages were all safely written to the queue disk in 23 minutes, with
36no slowdown as the queue filled up. After I reenabled deliveries, all
37the messages were delivered to the recipient's mailbox in under 12
38minutes. End-to-end rate: more than 200000 individual messages a day!
39
40* Overall performance: What really matters is how well qmail performs
41with your mail load. Red Hat Software found one day that their mail hub,
42a 48MB Pentium running sendmail 8.7, was running out of steam at 70000
43messages a day. They shifted the load to qmail---on a _smaller_ machine,
44a 16MB 486/66---and now they're doing fine.