From 172707cbe54cadfde1b9e1bdef8628985a2e75ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Wooding Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 11:48:46 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] symm/{chacha,salsa20}-x86ish-sse2.S: Fix typo in commentary. --- symm/chacha-x86ish-sse2.S | 12 ++++++------ symm/salsa20-x86ish-sse2.S | 12 ++++++------ 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/symm/chacha-x86ish-sse2.S b/symm/chacha-x86ish-sse2.S index 0989fd4b..2dab283b 100644 --- a/symm/chacha-x86ish-sse2.S +++ b/symm/chacha-x86ish-sse2.S @@ -42,12 +42,12 @@ FUNC(chacha_core_x86ish_sse2) #if CPUFAM_X86 // Arguments come in on the stack, and will need to be collected. We - // we can get away with just the scratch registers for integer work, - // but we'll run out of XMM registers and will need some properly - // aligned space which we'll steal from the stack. I don't trust the - // stack pointer's alignment, so I'll have to mask the stack pointer, - // which in turn means I'll need to keep track of the old value. - // Hence I'm making a full i386-style stack frame here. + // can get away with just the scratch registers for integer work, but + // we'll run out of XMM registers and will need some properly aligned + // space which we'll steal from the stack. I don't trust the stack + // pointer's alignment, so I'll have to mask the stack pointer, which + // in turn means I'll need to keep track of the old value. Hence I'm + // making a full i386-style stack frame here. // // The Windows and SysV ABIs are sufficiently similar that we don't // need to worry about the differences here. diff --git a/symm/salsa20-x86ish-sse2.S b/symm/salsa20-x86ish-sse2.S index ca677f17..9cbaeff4 100644 --- a/symm/salsa20-x86ish-sse2.S +++ b/symm/salsa20-x86ish-sse2.S @@ -42,12 +42,12 @@ FUNC(salsa20_core_x86ish_sse2) #if CPUFAM_X86 // Arguments come in on the stack, and will need to be collected. We - // we can get away with just the scratch registers for integer work, - // but we'll run out of XMM registers and will need some properly - // aligned space which we'll steal from the stack. I don't trust the - // stack pointer's alignment, so I'll have to mask the stack pointer, - // which in turn means I'll need to keep track of the old value. - // Hence I'm making a full i386-style stack frame here. + // can get away with just the scratch registers for integer work, but + // we'll run out of XMM registers and will need some properly aligned + // space which we'll steal from the stack. I don't trust the stack + // pointer's alignment, so I'll have to mask the stack pointer, which + // in turn means I'll need to keep track of the old value. Hence I'm + // making a full i386-style stack frame here. // // The Windows and SysV ABIs are sufficiently similar that we don't // need to worry about the differences here. -- 2.11.0