X-Git-Url: https://git.distorted.org.uk/~mdw/catacomb-python/blobdiff_plain/62f9f6c4f3408ba29d555a7ed27658bbeae270c0..3317491a2bc28732f805c8521777aafa52038793:/t/t-algorithms.py diff --git a/t/t-algorithms.py b/t/t-algorithms.py index 8e073f2..593e6cf 100644 --- a/t/t-algorithms.py +++ b/t/t-algorithms.py @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ def bad_key_size(ksz): if isinstance(ksz, C.KeySZAny): return None elif isinstance(ksz, C.KeySZRange): if ksz.mod != 1: return ksz.min + 1 - elif ksz.max != 0: return ksz.max + 1 + elif ksz.max is not None: return ksz.max + 1 elif ksz.min != 0: return ksz.min - 1 else: return None elif isinstance(ksz, C.KeySZSet): @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ def different_key_size(ksz, sz): if isinstance(ksz, C.KeySZAny): return sz + 1 elif isinstance(ksz, C.KeySZRange): if sz > ksz.min: return sz - ksz.mod - elif ksz.max == 0 or sz < ksz.max: return sz + ksz.mod + elif ksz.max is None or sz < ksz.max: return sz + ksz.mod else: return None elif isinstance(ksz, C.KeySZSet): for sz1 in sorted(ksz.set): @@ -76,8 +76,7 @@ class HashBufferTestMixin (U.TestCase): ## Check overflow detection. h0, _ = makefn(w) - me.assertRaises((OverflowError, ValueError), - hashfn, h0, 1 << 8*w) + me.assertRaises(OverflowError, hashfn, h0, 1 << 8*w) def check_hashbuffer_bufn(me, w, bigendp, makefn, hashfn): """Check `hashbufN'.""" @@ -95,8 +94,7 @@ class HashBufferTestMixin (U.TestCase): if w <= 3: n = 1 << 8*w h0, _ = makefn(w + n) - me.assertRaises((ValueError, OverflowError, TypeError), - hashfn, h0, C.ByteString.zero(n)) + me.assertRaises(ValueError, hashfn, h0, C.ByteString.zero(n)) def check_hashbuffer(me, makefn): """Test the various `hash...' methods.""" @@ -106,10 +104,9 @@ class HashBufferTestMixin (U.TestCase): me.check_hashbuffer_hashn(2, True, makefn, lambda h, n: h.hashu16(n)) me.check_hashbuffer_hashn(2, True, makefn, lambda h, n: h.hashu16b(n)) me.check_hashbuffer_hashn(2, False, makefn, lambda h, n: h.hashu16l(n)) - if hasattr(makefn(0)[0], "hashu24"): - me.check_hashbuffer_hashn(3, True, makefn, lambda h, n: h.hashu24(n)) - me.check_hashbuffer_hashn(3, True, makefn, lambda h, n: h.hashu24b(n)) - me.check_hashbuffer_hashn(3, False, makefn, lambda h, n: h.hashu24l(n)) + me.check_hashbuffer_hashn(3, True, makefn, lambda h, n: h.hashu24(n)) + me.check_hashbuffer_hashn(3, True, makefn, lambda h, n: h.hashu24b(n)) + me.check_hashbuffer_hashn(3, False, makefn, lambda h, n: h.hashu24l(n)) me.check_hashbuffer_hashn(4, True, makefn, lambda h, n: h.hashu32(n)) me.check_hashbuffer_hashn(4, True, makefn, lambda h, n: h.hashu32b(n)) me.check_hashbuffer_hashn(4, False, makefn, lambda h, n: h.hashu32l(n)) @@ -123,10 +120,9 @@ class HashBufferTestMixin (U.TestCase): me.check_hashbuffer_bufn(2, True, makefn, lambda h, x: h.hashbuf16(x)) me.check_hashbuffer_bufn(2, True, makefn, lambda h, x: h.hashbuf16b(x)) me.check_hashbuffer_bufn(2, False, makefn, lambda h, x: h.hashbuf16l(x)) - if hasattr(makefn(0)[0], "hashbuf24"): - me.check_hashbuffer_bufn(3, True, makefn, lambda h, x: h.hashbuf24(x)) - me.check_hashbuffer_bufn(3, True, makefn, lambda h, x: h.hashbuf24b(x)) - me.check_hashbuffer_bufn(3, False, makefn, lambda h, x: h.hashbuf24l(x)) + me.check_hashbuffer_bufn(3, True, makefn, lambda h, x: h.hashbuf24(x)) + me.check_hashbuffer_bufn(3, True, makefn, lambda h, x: h.hashbuf24b(x)) + me.check_hashbuffer_bufn(3, False, makefn, lambda h, x: h.hashbuf24l(x)) me.check_hashbuffer_bufn(4, True, makefn, lambda h, x: h.hashbuf32(x)) me.check_hashbuffer_bufn(4, True, makefn, lambda h, x: h.hashbuf32b(x)) me.check_hashbuffer_bufn(4, False, makefn, lambda h, x: h.hashbuf32l(x)) @@ -145,10 +141,11 @@ class TestKeysize (U.TestCase): me.assertEqual(type(ksz), C.KeySZAny) me.assertEqual(ksz.default, 20) me.assertEqual(ksz.min, 0) - me.assertEqual(ksz.max, 0) + me.assertEqual(ksz.max, None) for n in [0, 12, 20, 5000]: me.assertTrue(ksz.check(n)) me.assertEqual(ksz.best(n), n) + me.assertEqual(ksz.pad(n), n) ## A typical two-byte spec. (No published algorithms actually /need/ a ## two-byte key-size spec, but all of the HMAC variants use one anyway.) @@ -156,16 +153,17 @@ class TestKeysize (U.TestCase): me.assertEqual(type(ksz), C.KeySZAny) me.assertEqual(ksz.default, 32) me.assertEqual(ksz.min, 0) - me.assertEqual(ksz.max, 0) + me.assertEqual(ksz.max, None) for n in [0, 12, 20, 5000]: me.assertTrue(ksz.check(n)) me.assertEqual(ksz.best(n), n) + me.assertEqual(ksz.pad(n), n) ## Check construction. ksz = C.KeySZAny(15) me.assertEqual(ksz.default, 15) me.assertEqual(ksz.min, 0) - me.assertEqual(ksz.max, 0) + me.assertEqual(ksz.max, None) me.assertRaises(ValueError, lambda: C.KeySZAny(-8)) me.assertEqual(C.KeySZAny(0).default, 0) @@ -178,7 +176,7 @@ class TestKeysize (U.TestCase): me.assertEqual(ksz.default, 32) me.assertEqual(ksz.min, 10) me.assertEqual(ksz.max, 32) - me.assertEqual(set(ksz.set), set([10, 16, 32])) + me.assertEqual(ksz.set, set([10, 16, 32])) for x, best, pad in [(9, None, 10), (10, 10, 10), (11, 10, 16), (15, 10, 16), (16, 16, 16), (17, 16, 32), (31, 16, 32), (32, 32, 32), (33, 32, None)]: @@ -186,16 +184,18 @@ class TestKeysize (U.TestCase): else: me.assertFalse(ksz.check(x)) if best is None: me.assertRaises(ValueError, ksz.best, x) else: me.assertEqual(ksz.best(x), best) + if pad is None: me.assertRaises(ValueError, ksz.pad, x) + else: me.assertEqual(ksz.pad(x), pad) ## Check construction. ksz = C.KeySZSet(7) me.assertEqual(ksz.default, 7) - me.assertEqual(set(ksz.set), set([7])) + me.assertEqual(ksz.set, set([7])) me.assertEqual(ksz.min, 7) me.assertEqual(ksz.max, 7) - ksz = C.KeySZSet(7, [3, 6, 9]) + ksz = C.KeySZSet(7, iter([3, 6, 9])) me.assertEqual(ksz.default, 7) - me.assertEqual(set(ksz.set), set([3, 6, 7, 9])) + me.assertEqual(ksz.set, set([3, 6, 7, 9])) me.assertEqual(ksz.min, 3) me.assertEqual(ksz.max, 9) @@ -210,13 +210,15 @@ class TestKeysize (U.TestCase): me.assertEqual(ksz.min, 4) me.assertEqual(ksz.max, 32) me.assertEqual(ksz.mod, 4) - for x, best in [(3, None), (4, 4), (5, 4), - (15, 12), (16, 16), (17, 16), - (31, 28), (32, 32), (33, 32)]: - if x == best: me.assertTrue(ksz.check(x)) + for x, best, pad in [(3, None, 4), (4, 4, 4), (5, 4, 8), + (15, 12, 16), (16, 16, 16), (17, 16, 20), + (31, 28, 32), (32, 32, 32), (33, 32, None)]: + if x == best == pad: me.assertTrue(ksz.check(x)) else: me.assertFalse(ksz.check(x)) if best is None: me.assertRaises(ValueError, ksz.best, x) else: me.assertEqual(ksz.best(x), best) + if pad is None: me.assertRaises(ValueError, ksz.pad, x) + else: me.assertEqual(ksz.pad(x), pad) ## Check construction. ksz = C.KeySZRange(28, 21, 35, 7) @@ -224,6 +226,11 @@ class TestKeysize (U.TestCase): me.assertEqual(ksz.min, 21) me.assertEqual(ksz.max, 35) me.assertEqual(ksz.mod, 7) + ksz = C.KeySZRange(28, 21, None, 7) + me.assertEqual(ksz.min, 21) + me.assertEqual(ksz.max, None) + me.assertEqual(ksz.mod, 7) + me.assertEqual(ksz.pad(36), 42) me.assertRaises(ValueError, C.KeySZRange, 29, 21, 35, 7) me.assertRaises(ValueError, C.KeySZRange, 28, 20, 35, 7) me.assertRaises(ValueError, C.KeySZRange, 28, 21, 34, 7) @@ -310,6 +317,280 @@ TestCipher.generate_testcases((name, C.gcciphers[name]) for name in "blowfish-counter", "rc4", "seal", "salsa20/8", "shake128-xof"]) ###-------------------------------------------------------------------------- +class TestAuthenticatedEncryption \ + (HashBufferTestMixin, T.GenericTestMixin): + """Test authenticated encryption schemes.""" + + def _test_aead(me, aecls): + + ## Check the class properties. + me.assertEqual(type(aecls.name), str) + me.assertTrue(isinstance(aecls.keysz, C.KeySZ)) + me.assertTrue(isinstance(aecls.noncesz, C.KeySZ)) + me.assertTrue(isinstance(aecls.tagsz, C.KeySZ)) + me.assertEqual(type(aecls.blksz), int) + me.assertEqual(type(aecls.bufsz), int) + me.assertEqual(type(aecls.ohd), int) + me.assertEqual(type(aecls.flags), int) + + ## Check round-tripping, with full precommitment. First, select some + ## parameters. (It's conceivable that some AEAD schemes are more + ## restrictive than advertised by the various properties, but this works + ## out OK in practice.) + k = T.span(aecls.keysz.default) + n = T.span(aecls.noncesz.default) + if aecls.flags&C.AEADF_NOAAD: h = T.span(0) + else: h = T.span(131) + m = T.span(253) + tsz = aecls.tagsz.default + key = aecls(k) + + ## Next, encrypt a message, checking that things are proper as we go. + enc = key.enc(nonce = n, hsz = len(h), msz = len(m), tsz = tsz) + me.assertEqual(enc.hsz, len(h)) + me.assertEqual(enc.msz, len(m)) + me.assertEqual(enc.mlen, 0) + me.assertEqual(enc.tsz, tsz) + aad = enc.aad() + if aecls.flags&C.AEADF_AADNDEP: me.assertEqual(aad.hsz, len(h)) + else: me.assertEqual(aad.hsz, None) + me.assertEqual(aad.hlen, 0) + if not aecls.flags&C.AEADF_NOAAD: + aad.hash(h[0:83]) + me.assertEqual(aad.hlen, 83) + aad.hash(h[83:131]) + me.assertEqual(aad.hlen, 131) + c0 = enc.encrypt(m[0:57]) + me.assertEqual(enc.mlen, 57) + me.assertTrue(57 - aecls.bufsz <= len(c0) <= 57 + aecls.ohd) + c1 = enc.encrypt(m[57:189]) + me.assertEqual(enc.mlen, 189) + me.assertTrue(132 - aecls.bufsz <= len(c1) <= + 132 + aecls.bufsz + aecls.ohd) + c2 = enc.encrypt(m[189:253]) + me.assertEqual(enc.mlen, 253) + me.assertTrue(64 - aecls.bufsz <= len(c2) <= + 64 + aecls.bufsz + aecls.ohd) + c3, t = enc.done(aad = aad) + me.assertTrue(len(c3) <= aecls.bufsz + aecls.ohd) + c = c0 + c1 + c2 + c3 + me.assertTrue(len(m) <= len(c) <= len(m) + aecls.ohd) + me.assertEqual(len(t), tsz) + + ## And now decrypt it again, with different record boundaries. + dec = key.dec(nonce = n, hsz = len(h), csz = len(c), tsz = tsz) + me.assertEqual(dec.hsz, len(h)) + me.assertEqual(dec.csz, len(c)) + me.assertEqual(dec.clen, 0) + me.assertEqual(dec.tsz, tsz) + aad = dec.aad() + if aecls.flags&C.AEADF_AADNDEP: me.assertEqual(aad.hsz, len(h)) + else: me.assertEqual(aad.hsz, None) + me.assertEqual(aad.hlen, 0) + aad.hash(h) + m0 = dec.decrypt(c[0:156]) + me.assertTrue(156 - aecls.bufsz <= len(m0) <= 156) + m1 = dec.decrypt(c[156:]) + me.assertTrue(len(c) - 156 - aecls.bufsz <= len(m1) <= + len(c) - 156 + aecls.bufsz) + m2 = dec.done(tag = t, aad = aad) + me.assertEqual(m0 + m1 + m2, m) + + ## And again, with the wrong tag. + dec = key.dec(nonce = n, hsz = len(h), csz = len(c), tsz = tsz) + aad = dec.aad(); aad.hash(h) + _ = dec.decrypt(c) + me.assertRaises(ValueError, dec.done, tag = t ^ tsz*C.bytes("55")) + + ## Check that the all-in-one methods work. + me.assertEqual((c, t), + key.encrypt(n = n, h = h, m = m, tsz = tsz)) + me.assertEqual(m, + key.decrypt(n = n, h = h, c = c, t = t)) + + ## Check that bad key, nonce, and tag lengths are rejected. + badlen = bad_key_size(aecls.keysz) + if badlen is not None: me.assertRaises(ValueError, aecls, T.span(badlen)) + badlen = bad_key_size(aecls.noncesz) + if badlen is not None: + me.assertRaises(ValueError, key.enc, nonce = T.span(badlen), + hsz = len(h), msz = len(m), tsz = tsz) + me.assertRaises(ValueError, key.dec, nonce = T.span(badlen), + hsz = len(h), csz = len(c), tsz = tsz) + if not aecls.flags&C.AEADF_PCTSZ: + enc = key.enc(nonce = n, hsz = 0, msz = len(m)) + _ = enc.encrypt(m) + me.assertRaises(ValueError, enc.done, tsz = badlen) + badlen = bad_key_size(aecls.tagsz) + if badlen is not None: + me.assertRaises(ValueError, key.enc, nonce = n, + hsz = len(h), msz = len(m), tsz = badlen) + me.assertRaises(ValueError, key.dec, nonce = n, + hsz = len(h), csz = len(c), tsz = badlen) + + ## Check that we can't get a loose `aad' object from a scheme which has + ## nonce-dependent AAD processing. + if aecls.flags&C.AEADF_AADNDEP: me.assertRaises(ValueError, key.aad) + + ## Check the menagerie of AAD hashing methods. + if not aecls.flags&C.AEADF_NOAAD: + def mkhash(hsz): + enc = key.enc(nonce = n, hsz = hsz, msz = 0, tsz = tsz) + aad = enc.aad() + return aad, lambda: enc.done(aad = aad)[1] + me.check_hashbuffer(mkhash) + + ## Check that encryption/decryption works with the given precommitments. + def quick_enc_check(**kw): + enc = key.enc(**kw) + aad = enc.aad().hash(h) + c0 = enc.encrypt(m); c1, tt = enc.done(aad = aad, tsz = tsz) + me.assertEqual((c, t), (c0 + c1, tt)) + def quick_dec_check(**kw): + dec = key.dec(**kw) + aad = dec.aad().hash(h) + m0 = dec.decrypt(c); m1 = dec.done(aad = aad, tag = t) + me.assertEqual(m, m0 + m1) + + ## Check that we can get away without precommitting to the header length + ## if and only if the AEAD scheme says it will let us. + if aecls.flags&C.AEADF_PCHSZ: + me.assertRaises(ValueError, key.enc, nonce = n, + msz = len(m), tsz = tsz) + me.assertRaises(ValueError, key.dec, nonce = n, + csz = len(c), tsz = tsz) + else: + quick_enc_check(nonce = n, msz = len(m), tsz = tsz) + quick_dec_check(nonce = n, csz = len(c), tsz = tsz) + + ## Check that we can get away without precommitting to the message/ + ## ciphertext length if and only if the AEAD scheme says it will let us. + if aecls.flags&C.AEADF_PCMSZ: + me.assertRaises(ValueError, key.enc, nonce = n, + hsz = len(h), tsz = tsz) + me.assertRaises(ValueError, key.dec, nonce = n, + hsz = len(h), tsz = tsz) + else: + quick_enc_check(nonce = n, hsz = len(h), tsz = tsz) + quick_dec_check(nonce = n, hsz = len(h), tsz = tsz) + + ## Check that we can get away without precommitting to the tag length if + ## and only if the AEAD scheme says it will let us. + if aecls.flags&C.AEADF_PCTSZ: + me.assertRaises(ValueError, key.enc, nonce = n, + hsz = len(h), msz = len(m)) + me.assertRaises(ValueError, key.dec, nonce = n, + hsz = len(h), csz = len(c)) + else: + quick_enc_check(nonce = n, hsz = len(h), msz = len(m)) + quick_dec_check(nonce = n, hsz = len(h), csz = len(c)) + + ## Check that if we precommit to the header length, we're properly held + ## to the commitment. + if not aecls.flags&C.AEADF_NOAAD: + + ## First, check encryption with underrun. If we must supply AAD first, + ## then the underrun will be reported when we start trying to encrypt; + ## otherwise, checking is delayed until `done'. + enc = key.enc(nonce = n, hsz = len(h), msz = len(m), tsz = tsz) + aad = enc.aad().hash(h[0:83]) + if aecls.flags&C.AEADF_AADFIRST: + me.assertRaises(ValueError, enc.encrypt, m) + else: + _ = enc.encrypt(m) + me.assertRaises(ValueError, enc.done, aad = aad) + + ## Next, check decryption with underrun. If we must supply AAD first, + ## then the underrun will be reported when we start trying to encrypt; + ## otherwise, checking is delayed until `done'. + dec = key.dec(nonce = n, hsz = len(h), csz = len(c), tsz = tsz) + aad = dec.aad().hash(h[0:83]) + if aecls.flags&C.AEADF_AADFIRST: + me.assertRaises(ValueError, dec.decrypt, c) + else: + _ = dec.decrypt(c) + me.assertRaises(ValueError, dec.done, tag = t, aad = aad) + + ## If AAD processing is nonce-dependent then an overrun will be + ## detected imediately. + if aecls.flags&C.AEADF_AADNDEP: + enc = key.enc(nonce = n, hsz = len(h), msz = len(m), tsz = tsz) + aad = enc.aad().hash(h[0:83]) + me.assertRaises(ValueError, aad.hash, h[82:131]) + dec = key.dec(nonce = n, hsz = len(h), csz = len(c), tsz = tsz) + aad = dec.aad().hash(h[0:83]) + me.assertRaises(ValueError, aad.hash, h[82:131]) + + ## Some additional tests for nonce-dependent `aad' objects. + if aecls.flags&C.AEADF_AADNDEP: + + ## Check that `aad' objects can't be used once their parents are gone. + enc = key.enc(nonce = n, hsz = len(h), msz = len(m), tsz = tsz) + aad = enc.aad() + del enc + me.assertRaises(ValueError, aad.hash, h) + + ## Check that they can't be crossed over. + enc0 = key.enc(nonce = n, hsz = len(h), msz = len(m), tsz = tsz) + enc1 = key.enc(nonce = n, hsz = len(h), msz = len(m), tsz = tsz) + enc0.aad().hash(h) + aad1 = enc1.aad().hash(h) + _ = enc0.encrypt(m) + me.assertRaises(ValueError, enc0.done, tsz = tsz, aad = aad1) + + ## Test copying AAD. + if not aecls.flags&C.AEADF_AADNDEP and not aecls.flags&C.AEADF_NOAAD: + aad0 = key.aad() + aad0.hash(h[0:83]) + aad1 = aad0.copy() + aad2 = aad1.copy() + aad0.hash(h[83:131]) + aad1.hash(h[83:131]) + aad2.hash(h[83:131] ^ 48*C.bytes("ff")) + me.assertEqual(key.enc(nonce = n, hsz = len(h), + msz = 0, tsz = tsz).done(aad = aad0), + key.enc(nonce = n, hsz = len(h), + msz = 0, tsz = tsz).done(aad = aad1)) + me.assertNotEqual(key.enc(nonce = n, hsz = len(h), + msz = 0, tsz = tsz).done(aad = aad0), + key.enc(nonce = n, hsz = len(h), + msz = 0, tsz = tsz).done(aad = aad2)) + + ## Check that if we precommit to the message length, we're properly held + ## to the commitment. (Fortunately, this is way simpler than the AAD + ## case above.) First, try an underrun. + enc = key.enc(nonce = n, hsz = 0, msz = len(m), tsz = tsz) + _ = enc.encrypt(m[0:183]) + me.assertRaises(ValueError, enc.done, tsz = tsz) + dec = key.dec(nonce = n, hsz = 0, csz = len(c), tsz = tsz) + _ = dec.decrypt(c[0:183]) + me.assertRaises(ValueError, dec.done, tag = t) + + ## And now an overrun. + enc = key.enc(nonce = n, hsz = 0, msz = 183, tsz = tsz) + me.assertRaises(ValueError, enc.encrypt, m) + dec = key.dec(nonce = n, hsz = 0, csz = 183, tsz = tsz) + me.assertRaises(ValueError, dec.decrypt, c) + + ## Finally, check that if we precommit to a tag length, we're properly + ## held to the commitment. This depends on being able to find a tag size + ## which isn't the default. + tsz1 = different_key_size(aecls.tagsz, tsz) + if tsz1 is not None: + enc = key.enc(nonce = n, hsz = 0, msz = len(m), tsz = tsz1) + _ = enc.encrypt(m) + me.assertRaises(ValueError, enc.done, tsz = tsz) + dec = key.dec(nonce = n, hsz = len(h), csz = len(c), tsz = tsz1) + aad = dec.aad().hash(h) + _ = dec.decrypt(c) + me.assertRaises(ValueError, enc.done, tsz = tsz, aad = aad) + +TestAuthenticatedEncryption.generate_testcases \ + ((name, C.gcaeads[name]) for name in + ["des3-ccm", "blowfish-ocb1", "square-ocb3", "rijndael-gcm", + "serpent-eax", "salsa20-naclbox", "chacha20-poly1305"]) + +###-------------------------------------------------------------------------- class BaseTestHash (HashBufferTestMixin): """Base class for testing hash functions.""" @@ -317,29 +598,28 @@ class BaseTestHash (HashBufferTestMixin): """ Check hash class HCLS. - If NEED_BUFSZ is false, then don't insist that HCLS have working `bufsz', - `name', or `hashsz' attributes. This test is mostly reused for MACs, - which don't have these attributes. + If NEED_BUFSZ is false, then don't insist that HCLS has a working `bufsz' + attribute. This test is mostly reused for MACs, which don't have this + attribute. """ ## Check the class properties. - if need_bufsz: - me.assertEqual(type(hcls.name), str) - me.assertEqual(type(hcls.bufsz), int) - me.assertEqual(type(hcls.hashsz), int) + me.assertEqual(type(hcls.name), str) + if need_bufsz: me.assertEqual(type(hcls.bufsz), int) + me.assertEqual(type(hcls.hashsz), int) ## Set some initial values. m = T.span(131) h = hcls().hash(m).done() ## Check that hash length comes out right. - if need_bufsz: me.assertEqual(len(h), hcls.hashsz) + me.assertEqual(len(h), hcls.hashsz) ## Check that we get the same answer if we split the message up. me.assertEqual(h, hcls().hash(m[0:73]).hash(m[73:131]).done()) ## Check the `check' method. me.assertTrue(hcls().hash(m).check(h)) - me.assertFalse(hcls().hash(m).check(h ^ len(h)*C.bytes("aa"))) + me.assertFalse(hcls().hash(m).check(h ^ hcls.hashsz*C.bytes("aa"))) ## Check the menagerie of random hashing methods. def mkhash(_): @@ -369,6 +649,7 @@ class TestMessageAuthentication (BaseTestHash, T.GenericTestMixin): ## Test hashing. k = T.span(mcls.keysz.default) key = mcls(k) + me.assertEqual(key.hashsz, key.tagsz) me.check_hash(key, need_bufsz = False) ## Check that bad key lengths are rejected. @@ -388,7 +669,7 @@ class TestPoly1305 (HashBufferTestMixin): me.assertEqual(C.poly1305.name, "poly1305") me.assertEqual(type(C.poly1305.keysz), C.KeySZSet) me.assertEqual(C.poly1305.keysz.default, 16) - me.assertEqual(set(C.poly1305.keysz.set), set([16])) + me.assertEqual(C.poly1305.keysz.set, set([16])) me.assertEqual(C.poly1305.tagsz, 16) me.assertEqual(C.poly1305.masksz, 16) @@ -400,6 +681,9 @@ class TestPoly1305 (HashBufferTestMixin): t = key(u).hash(m).done() ## Check the key properties. + me.assertEqual(key.name, "poly1305") + me.assertEqual(key.tagsz, 16) + me.assertEqual(key.tagsz, 16) me.assertEqual(len(t), 16) ## Check that we get the same answer if we split the message up. @@ -432,7 +716,7 @@ class TestHLatin (U.TestCase): """Test the `hsalsa20' and `hchacha20' functions.""" def test_hlatin(me): - kk = [T.span(sz) for sz in [32]] + kk = [T.span(sz) for sz in [10, 16, 32]] n = T.span(16) bad_k = T.span(18) bad_n = T.span(13) @@ -462,6 +746,13 @@ class TestKeccak (HashBufferTestMixin): st1.mix(m0).step() me.assertNotEqual(st0.extract(32), st1.extract(32)) + ## Check state copying. + st1 = st0.copy() + mask = st1.extract(len(m1)) + st0.mix(m1) + st1.mix(m1) + me.assertEqual(st0.extract(32), st1.extract(32)) + ## Check error conditions. _ = st0.extract(200) me.assertRaises(ValueError, st0.extract, 201) @@ -501,7 +792,7 @@ class TestKeccak (HashBufferTestMixin): ## Check masking. x = xcls().hash(m).xof() - me.assertEqual(x.mask(m), C.ByteString(m) ^ C.ByteString(h[0:len(m)])) + me.assertEqual(x.mask(m), m ^ h[0:len(m)]) ## Check the `check' method. me.assertTrue(xcls().hash(m).check(h0)) @@ -510,14 +801,14 @@ class TestKeccak (HashBufferTestMixin): ## Check the menagerie of random hashing methods. def mkhash(_): x = xcls(func = func, perso = perso) - return x, lambda: x.done(100 - x.rate//2) + return x, x.done me.check_hashbuffer(mkhash) ## Check the state machine tracking. x = xcls(); me.assertEqual(x.state, "absorb") x.hash(m); me.assertEqual(x.state, "absorb") xx = x.copy() - h = xx.done(100 - x.rate//2) + h = xx.done(); me.assertEqual(len(h), 100 - x.rate//2) me.assertEqual(xx.state, "dead") me.assertRaises(ValueError, xx.done, 1) me.assertRaises(ValueError, xx.get, 1) @@ -533,7 +824,7 @@ class TestKeccak (HashBufferTestMixin): def check_kmac(me, mcls, c): k = T.span(32) - me.check_shake(lambda func = None, perso = T.bin(""): + me.check_shake(lambda func = None, perso = None: mcls(k, perso = perso), c, done_matches_xof = False)