From f98b826007692d62a286b12c0360617480828d02 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ben <ben@cda61777-01e9-0310-a592-d414129be87e>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 21:07:52 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] As far as I can see (at least in NetBSD) O_NONBLOCK and
 FIONBIO are equivalent, except that O_NONBLOCK is standardised and FIONBIO
 isn't.  In consequence, replace our only use of FIONBIO with O_NONBLOCK.

Inspired by Jonathan H N Chin, who had problems with this on Solaris.


git-svn-id: svn://svn.tartarus.org/sgt/putty@7753 cda61777-01e9-0310-a592-d414129be87e
---
 unix/uxpty.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/unix/uxpty.c b/unix/uxpty.c
index 60dc7f7d..ca7e98ad 100644
--- a/unix/uxpty.c
+++ b/unix/uxpty.c
@@ -360,8 +360,10 @@ static void pty_open_master(Pty pty)
         /*
          * Set the pty master into non-blocking mode.
          */
-        int i = 1;
-        ioctl(pty->master_fd, FIONBIO, &i);
+        int fl;
+	fl = fcntl(pty->master_fd, F_GETFL);
+	if (fl != -1 && !(fl & O_NONBLOCK))
+	    fcntl(pty->master_fd, F_SETFL, fl | O_NONBLOCK);
     }
 
     if (!ptys_by_fd)
-- 
2.11.0