From: simon <simon@cda61777-01e9-0310-a592-d414129be87e>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:49:00 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: No, I take that back: we _do_ have a mechanism for suppressing reads
X-Git-Url: https://git.distorted.org.uk/u/mdw/putty/commitdiff_plain/a699eb41b9aa738514f36a8e5f3007495a52b05b?ds=sidebyside;hp=a699eb41b9aa738514f36a8e5f3007495a52b05b

No, I take that back: we _do_ have a mechanism for suppressing reads
from forwarding data sources which will be good enough to last until
we close the socket, in the form of the override_throttle() functions.
So this finishes up the work in r9283, by manufacturing outgoing EOF
in response to incoming CLOSE on all channel types.


git-svn-id: svn://svn.tartarus.org/sgt/putty@9284 cda61777-01e9-0310-a592-d414129be87e
---