X-Git-Url: https://git.distorted.org.uk/u/mdw/putty/blobdiff_plain/04d41bf83da09f8b3149b41d325b3696048dc784..ebe9a9565af73f9c3fa1da198f8cd7d9afbe6729:/doc/faq.but

diff --git a/doc/faq.but b/doc/faq.but
index 15f3e8fd..d3067d8e 100644
--- a/doc/faq.but
+++ b/doc/faq.but
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-\versionid $Id: faq.but,v 1.38 2002/11/21 00:15:52 jacob Exp $
+\versionid $Id: faq.but,v 1.42 2003/01/24 14:12:31 jacob Exp $
 
 \A{faq} PuTTY FAQ
 
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ listed there, it's been implemented. If it's listed as a change made
 development snapshots, in which case testing will be very welcome.
 
 \b try the
-\W{http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist.html}{Wishlist
+\W{http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist/}{Wishlist
 page}, and see if you can find the feature there. If it's on there,
 it probably \e{hasn't} been implemented.
 
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ happens.
 \H{faq-ports} Ports to other operating systems
 
 The eventual goal is for PuTTY to be a multi-platform program, able
-to run on at least Windows, MacOS and Unix.
+to run on at least Windows, Mac OS and Unix.
 
 Porting will become easier once PuTTY has a generalised porting
 layer, drawing a clear line between platform-dependent and
@@ -177,8 +177,9 @@ be working so far.
 
 Currently, release versions of PuTTY only run on full Win32 systems.
 This includes Windows 95, 98, and ME, and it includes Windows NT,
-Windows 2000 and Windows XP. In the development code, a partial port
-to Unix is under way (see \k{faq-unix}).
+Windows 2000 and Windows XP. In the development code, partial ports
+to Unix (see \k{faq-unix}) and the Mac OS (see \k{faq-mac-port}).
+are under way.
 
 Currently PuTTY does \e{not} run on Windows CE (see \k{faq-wince}),
 and it does not quite run on the Win32s environment under Windows
@@ -232,10 +233,9 @@ testing in this area would be very welcome!
 
 \S{faq-mac-port}{Question} Will there be a port to the Mac?
 
-A Mac port was started once and is half-finished, but development
-has been static for some time and the main PuTTY code has moved on,
-so it's not clear how quickly development would resume even if
-developer effort were available.
+Eventually.  The terminal emulation code has been ported, as has the
+saved-settings infrastructure, but networking and a configuration GUI
+still need to be done before the port will be of any use.
 
 \S{faq-epoc}{Question} Will there be a port to EPOC?
 
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ Bourne shell derivative) or \c{.login} (if you use a C shell).
 Putting them in more general files such as \c{.bashrc} or \c{.cshrc}
 is liable to lead to problems.
 
-\S{faq-psftp-slow} PSFTP transfers files much slower than PSCP.
+\S{faq-psftp-slow}{Question} PSFTP transfers files much slower than PSCP.
 
 We believe this is because the SFTP and SSH2 protocols are less
 efficient at bulk data transfer than SCP and SSH1, because every
@@ -766,6 +766,25 @@ key in the wrong format isn't optimal.
 To connect using SSH 2 to a server that supports both versions, you
 need to change the configuration from the default (see \k{faq-ssh2}).
 
+\S{faq-rh8-utf8}{Question} When I'm connected to a Red Hat Linux 8.0
+system, some characters don't display properly.
+
+A common complaint is that hyphens in man pages show up as a-acute.
+
+With release 8.0, Red Hat appear to have made UTF-8 the default
+character set. There appears to be no way for terminal emulators such
+as PuTTY to know this (as far as we know, the appropriate escape
+sequence to switch into UTF-8 mode isn't sent).
+
+A fix is to configure sessions to RH8 systems to use UTF-8
+translation - see \k{config-charset} in the documentation. (Note that
+if you use \q{Change Settings}, changes may not take place immediately
+- see \k{faq-resetterm}.)
+
+If you really want to change the character set used by the server, the
+right place is \c{/etc/sysconfig/i18n}, but this shouldn't be
+necessary.
+
 \H{faq-secure} Security questions
 
 \S{faq-publicpc}{Question} Is it safe for me to download PuTTY and