\S{faq-ssh2-keyfmt}{Question} Does PuTTY support reading OpenSSH or
\cw{ssh.com} SSH-2 private key files?
-PuTTY doesn't support this natively, but as of 0.53
+PuTTY doesn't support this natively (see
+\W{http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist/key-formats-natively.html}{the wishlist entry}
+for reasons why not), but as of 0.53
PuTTYgen can convert both OpenSSH and \cw{ssh.com} private key
files into PuTTY's format.
\S{faq-wince}{Question} Will there be a port to Windows CE or PocketPC?
-It's currently being worked on, but it's only in its early stages yet,
-and certainly isn't yet useful. PuTTY on portable devices would
-clearly be a useful thing, so in the long term I hope it can be
-brought up to release quality.
+We have done some work on such a port, but it only reached an early
+stage, and certainly not a useful one. It's no longer being actively
+worked on.
-There's also a third-party port at
-\W{http://pocketputty.duxy.net/}\c{http://pocketputty.duxy.net/}.
+However, there's a third-party port at
+\W{http://www.pocketputty.net/}\c{http://www.pocketputty.net/}.
\S{faq-win31}{Question} Is there a port to \i{Windows 3.1}?
\c HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\SimonTatham\PuTTY\RandSeedFile
+You can ask PuTTY to delete all this data; see \k{faq-cleanup}.
+
On Unix, PuTTY stores all of this data in a directory \cw{~/.putty}.
\H{faq-howto} HOWTO questions
\S{faq-xpwontrun}{Question} PuTTY fails to start up. Windows claims that
\q{the application configuration is incorrect}.
-This is caused by a bug in certain versions of \i{Windows XP} which is
-triggered by PuTTY 0.58. It can be avoided by installing
-Service Pack 2, by using a different version of PuTTY, or by installing
-a special \i{manifest file} alongside the PuTTY executable.
-The
+This is caused by a bug in certain versions of \i{Windows XP} which
+is triggered by PuTTY 0.58. This was fixed in 0.59. The
\W{http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist/xp-wont-run}{\q{xp-wont-run}}
entry in PuTTY's wishlist has more details.
Having said all that, if you still really \e{want} to give us money,
we won't argue :-) The easiest way for us to accept donations is if
you send money to \cw{<anakin@pobox.com>} using PayPal
-(\W{http://www.paypal.com/}\cw{www.paypal.com}). Alternatively, if
-you don't trust PayPal, you could donate through e-gold
-(\W{http://www.e-gold.com}\cw{www.e-gold.com}): deposit your
-donation in account number 174769, then send us e-mail to let us
-know you've done so (otherwise we might not notice for months!).
+(\W{http://www.paypal.com/}\cw{www.paypal.com}). If you don't like
+PayPal, talk to us; we can probably arrange some alternative means.
Small donations (tens of dollars or tens of euros) will probably be
spent on beer or curry, which helps motivate our volunteer team to
\S{faq-permission}{Question} Can I have permission to put PuTTY on a
cover disk / distribute it with other software / etc?
-Yes. You need not bother asking us explicitly for permission. You
-already have permission. Redistribution of the unmodified PuTTY
-binary in this way is entirely permitted by our licence (see
-\k{licence}), and you are welcome to do it as much as you like.
+Yes. For most things, you need not bother asking us explicitly for
+permission; our licence already grants you permission.
-If you are distributing PuTTY within your own organisation, or for
-use with your own product, then we recommend (but do not insist)
-that you offer your own first-line technical support, to answer
-questions directly relating to the interaction of PuTTY with your
-particular environment. If your users mail us directly, we won't be
-able to give them very much help about things specific to your own
-setup.
+See \k{feedback-permission} for more details.
\S{faq-indemnity}{Question} Can you sign an agreement indemnifying
us against security problems in PuTTY?
would switch to the latter. Therefore, it would be pretty stupid of
us to try it.)
+\S{faq-export-cert}{Question} Can you provide us with export control
+information / FIPS certification for PuTTY?
+
+Some people have asked us for an Export Control Classification Number
+(ECCN) for PuTTY. We don't know whether we have one, and as a team of
+free software developers based in the UK we don't have the time,
+money, or effort to deal with US bureaucracy to investigate any
+further. We believe that PuTTY falls under 5D002 on the US Commerce
+Control List, but that shouldn't be taken as definitive. If you need
+to know more you should seek professional legal advice. The same
+applies to any other country's legal requirements and restrictions.
+
+Similarly, some people have asked us for FIPS certification of the
+PuTTY tools. Unless someone else is prepared to do the necessary work
+and pay any costs, we can't provide this.
+
\H{faq-misc} Miscellaneous questions
\S{faq-openssh}{Question} Is PuTTY a port of \i{OpenSSH}, or based on