Add index terms for GSSAPI stuff. Mention GSSAPI in "use system username"

[u/mdw/putty] / doc / faq.but

diff --git a/doc/faq.but b/doc/faq.but
index 4c1c309..ded2d19 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/faq.but
+++ b/doc/faq.but
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ completely is the wrong solution and we will not do it.
 
 If you have host keys available in the common \i\c{known_hosts} format,
 we have a script called 
-\W{http://svn.tartarus.org/putty/contrib/kh2reg.py?view=markup}\c{kh2reg.py}
+\W{http://svn.tartarus.org/sgt/putty/contrib/kh2reg.py?view=markup}\c{kh2reg.py}
 to convert them to a Windows .REG file, which can be installed ahead of
 time by double-clicking or using \c{REGEDIT}.
 
@@ -208,15 +208,22 @@ seems to be working so far.
 \S{faq-ports-general}{Question} What ports of PuTTY exist?
 
 Currently, release versions of PuTTY tools only run on full Win32
-systems and Unix. \q{Win32} includes Windows 95, 98, and ME, and it
-includes Windows NT, 2000, XP, and Vista.
+systems and Unix. \q{\i{Win32}} includes versions of Windows from
+Windows 95 onwards (as opposed to the 16-bit Windows 3.1; see
+\k{faq-win31}), up to and including Windows 7; and we know of no
+reason why PuTTY should not continue to work on future versions
+of Windows.
+
+The Windows executables we provide are for the 32-bit \q{\i{x86}}
+processor architecture, but they should work fine on 64-bit
+processors that are backward-compatible with that architecture.
+(We used to also provide executables for Windows for the Alpha
+processor, but stopped after 0.58 due to lack of interest.)
 
 In the development code, partial ports to the Mac OSes exist (see
 \k{faq-mac-port}).
 
-Currently PuTTY does \e{not} run on Windows CE (see \k{faq-wince}),
-and it does not quite run on the Win32s environment under Windows
-3.1 (see \k{faq-win31}).
+Currently PuTTY does \e{not} run on Windows CE (see \k{faq-wince}).
 
 We do not have release-quality ports for any other systems at the
 present time. If anyone told you we had an EPOC port, or an iPaq port,