Of course, that cleanup I did earlier in which I rationalised all

[u/mdw/putty] / doc / faq.but

diff --git a/doc/faq.but b/doc/faq.but
index 4c62927..d3067d8 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/faq.but
+++ b/doc/faq.but
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-\versionid $Id: faq.but,v 1.40 2002/12/15 11:51:21 jacob Exp $
+\versionid $Id: faq.but,v 1.42 2003/01/24 14:12:31 jacob Exp $

 
 \A{faq} PuTTY FAQ
 
 
 \A{faq} PuTTY FAQ
 


@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ listed there, it's been implemented. If it's listed as a change made
 development snapshots, in which case testing will be very welcome.
 
 \b try the
 development snapshots, in which case testing will be very welcome.
 
 \b try the

-\W{http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist.html}{Wishlist
+\W{http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist/}{Wishlist

 page}, and see if you can find the feature there. If it's on there,
 it probably \e{hasn't} been implemented.
 
 page}, and see if you can find the feature there. If it's on there,
 it probably \e{hasn't} been implemented.
 


@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ Bourne shell derivative) or \c{.login} (if you use a C shell).
 Putting them in more general files such as \c{.bashrc} or \c{.cshrc}
 is liable to lead to problems.
 
 Putting them in more general files such as \c{.bashrc} or \c{.cshrc}
 is liable to lead to problems.
 

-\S{faq-psftp-slow} PSFTP transfers files much slower than PSCP.
+\S{faq-psftp-slow}{Question} PSFTP transfers files much slower than PSCP.

 
 We believe this is because the SFTP and SSH2 protocols are less
 efficient at bulk data transfer than SCP and SSH1, because every
 
 We believe this is because the SFTP and SSH2 protocols are less
 efficient at bulk data transfer than SCP and SSH1, because every